header-logo header-logo

What price change?

23 May 2014 / Nicholas Heaton
Issue: 7607 / Categories: Opinion , Procedure & practice , Litigation trends
printer mail-detail
web_heaton_0

What impact will the Jackson reforms have on international litigants’ views of the English court system, asks Nicholas Heaton

The English court system is undergoing a real upheaval at the moment as a result of the Jackson reforms. Most litigants who will feel the impact of those changes have no real choice as to the court system that will determine their disputes. However, others do have a choice, both English litigants who can look to other jurisdictions to resolve their disputes and foreign litigants, who currently turn to the English courts in significant numbers.

View from abroad

The English court system is rightly held out as one of the “best in the world”, with its high-calibre judiciary and lawyers and its general sense of fair play. English justice is in itself a major export. According to a 2013 study, the English Commercial Court remains the court of choice for foreign litigants, having heard more than 1,600 cases brought by parties from abroad in the last five years. This is nearly twice

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bloomsbury Square Employment Law—Donna Clancy

Bloomsbury Square Employment Law—Donna Clancy

Employment law team strengthened with partner appointment

mfg Solicitors—Matt Smith

mfg Solicitors—Matt Smith

Corporate solicitor joins as partner in Birmingham

Freeths—Joe Lythgoe

Freeths—Joe Lythgoe

Corporate director with expertise in creative industries joins mergers and acquisitions team

NEWS
The High Court’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has thrown the careers of experienced CILEX litigators into jeopardy, warns Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers in NLJ this week
Sir Brian Leveson’s claim that there is ‘no right to jury trial’ erects a constitutional straw man, argues Professor Graham Zellick KC in NLJ this week. He argues that Leveson dismantles a position almost no-one truly holds, and thereby obscures the deeper issue: the jury’s place within the UK’s constitutional tradition
Why have private prosecutions surged despite limited data? Niall Hearty of Rahman Ravelli explores their rise in this week's NLJ 
The public law team at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer surveys significant recent human rights and judicial review rulings in this week's NLJ
In this week's NLJ, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley examines how debarring orders, while attractive to claimants seeking swift resolution, can complicate trials—most notably in fraud cases requiring ‘particularly cogent’ proof
back-to-top-scroll