header-logo header-logo

23 May 2014 / Nicholas Heaton
Issue: 7607 / Categories: Opinion , Procedure & practice , Litigation trends
printer mail-detail

What price change?

web_heaton_0

What impact will the Jackson reforms have on international litigants’ views of the English court system, asks Nicholas Heaton

The English court system is undergoing a real upheaval at the moment as a result of the Jackson reforms. Most litigants who will feel the impact of those changes have no real choice as to the court system that will determine their disputes. However, others do have a choice, both English litigants who can look to other jurisdictions to resolve their disputes and foreign litigants, who currently turn to the English courts in significant numbers.

View from abroad

The English court system is rightly held out as one of the “best in the world”, with its high-calibre judiciary and lawyers and its general sense of fair play. English justice is in itself a major export. According to a 2013 study, the English Commercial Court remains the court of choice for foreign litigants, having heard more than 1,600 cases brought by parties from abroad in the last five years. This is nearly twice

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll