header-logo header-logo

22 November 2013 / Edward Heaton
Issue: 7585 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

What’s mine is mine...

Ed Heaton explores the rights of cohabitants

In her recently published article in NLJ, Geraldine Morris considered the approach of the courts to periods of cohabitation within the context of divorce proceedings (both cohabitation between the parties prior to their marriage and the cohabitation of one of the parties with a third party post separation). This article will look at the stark contrast between the positions of cohabitants upon separation and those of spouses upon divorce.

In her article, Ms Morris referred to the case of GW v RW [2003] 2 FCR 289, [2003] All ER (D) 40 (May). In his judgment in that case, Nicholas Mostyn QC, sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge, (as he then was) held that, where a relationship had moved seamlessly from cohabitation to marriage, it was artificial to treat the periods differently. In practice, therefore, any period of pre-marital cohabitation is likely to be added to the term of a marriage for the purposes of measuring the length of the marriage, something which is often

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
back-to-top-scroll