header-logo header-logo

22 November 2013 / Edward Heaton
Issue: 7585 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

What’s mine is mine...

Ed Heaton explores the rights of cohabitants

In her recently published article in NLJ, Geraldine Morris considered the approach of the courts to periods of cohabitation within the context of divorce proceedings (both cohabitation between the parties prior to their marriage and the cohabitation of one of the parties with a third party post separation). This article will look at the stark contrast between the positions of cohabitants upon separation and those of spouses upon divorce.

In her article, Ms Morris referred to the case of GW v RW [2003] 2 FCR 289, [2003] All ER (D) 40 (May). In his judgment in that case, Nicholas Mostyn QC, sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge, (as he then was) held that, where a relationship had moved seamlessly from cohabitation to marriage, it was artificial to treat the periods differently. In practice, therefore, any period of pre-marital cohabitation is likely to be added to the term of a marriage for the purposes of measuring the length of the marriage, something which is often

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll