header-logo header-logo

16 March 2018 / Emilie Jones , Alan Sheeley
Issue: 7785 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

What’s privileged?

Alan Sheeley & Emilie Jones review the role & scope of litigation privilege in internal investigations

  • Recent cases show that the days of claiming litigation privilege over documents without fear of challenge are gone.
  • The purpose of an investigation should be set out clearly in external and internal communications.

Internal investigations are a vital risk management tool for corporate organisations. When serious allegations of wrongdoing are made, whether by a whistleblower, regulator, third party or the media, thorough investigation enables the organisation to understand what has happened, address potential exposures, improve risk management systems and manage reputational risk. Corporate focus on internal investigations has also been fuelled by the growing number of self-reporting obligations and incentives.

Against this backdrop, businesses have been troubled by recent case law perceived to erode their ability to rely on legal professional privilege to avoid disclosing documents created during investigations to parties in subsequent civil or criminal proceedings.

However, the recent decision of Bilta v RBS [2017] EWHC 3535 (Ch) demonstrates that, in appropriate circumstances, the products of a properly structured and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll