header-logo header-logo

03 October 2013 / Peter Thompson KC
Issue: 7578 / Categories: Opinion , Banking
printer mail-detail

Whatever happened to toxic debt?

illustration_converted_2

Peter Thompson QC explains why UK taxpayers deserve an amnesty

The conventional wisdom is that in 2008 the Western economy was rocked and almost brought down by toxic assets in the stream of commerce. The classic example of a toxic asset is the sub-prime mortgage, but no less toxic is the sub-prime loan in the form of unsecured loan facilities provided by credit cards. According to Credit Action, in the UK the total sum of individual debt, secured and unsecured, rose from £1,100bn in 2005 to £1,425bn in 2008, which is roughly where it is today. Assuming, for the sake of what follows, that the increase between 2005 to 2008 was caused by the addition of seriously toxic business, we are looking at a toxic lake of about £325bn.

As wise economists have observed, although in most cases after the event, financial institutions should beware of putting toxic products on the market: the whole banking system is thereby put at risk of being poisoned. By 2008 it had become very sick

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll