header-logo header-logo

03 October 2013 / Peter Thompson KC
Issue: 7578 / Categories: Opinion , Banking
printer mail-detail

Whatever happened to toxic debt?

illustration_converted_2

Peter Thompson QC explains why UK taxpayers deserve an amnesty

The conventional wisdom is that in 2008 the Western economy was rocked and almost brought down by toxic assets in the stream of commerce. The classic example of a toxic asset is the sub-prime mortgage, but no less toxic is the sub-prime loan in the form of unsecured loan facilities provided by credit cards. According to Credit Action, in the UK the total sum of individual debt, secured and unsecured, rose from £1,100bn in 2005 to £1,425bn in 2008, which is roughly where it is today. Assuming, for the sake of what follows, that the increase between 2005 to 2008 was caused by the addition of seriously toxic business, we are looking at a toxic lake of about £325bn.

As wise economists have observed, although in most cases after the event, financial institutions should beware of putting toxic products on the market: the whole banking system is thereby put at risk of being poisoned. By 2008 it had become very sick

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Chair of the Association of Pension Lawyers joins as partner

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Group names Shakespeare Martineau partner head of Sheffield office

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Four legal directors promoted to partner across UK offices

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll