header-logo header-logo

03 October 2013 / Peter Thompson KC
Issue: 7578 / Categories: Opinion , Banking
printer mail-detail

Whatever happened to toxic debt?

illustration_converted_2

Peter Thompson QC explains why UK taxpayers deserve an amnesty

The conventional wisdom is that in 2008 the Western economy was rocked and almost brought down by toxic assets in the stream of commerce. The classic example of a toxic asset is the sub-prime mortgage, but no less toxic is the sub-prime loan in the form of unsecured loan facilities provided by credit cards. According to Credit Action, in the UK the total sum of individual debt, secured and unsecured, rose from £1,100bn in 2005 to £1,425bn in 2008, which is roughly where it is today. Assuming, for the sake of what follows, that the increase between 2005 to 2008 was caused by the addition of seriously toxic business, we are looking at a toxic lake of about £325bn.

As wise economists have observed, although in most cases after the event, financial institutions should beware of putting toxic products on the market: the whole banking system is thereby put at risk of being poisoned. By 2008 it had become very sick

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll