header-logo header-logo

17 January 2025 / Henry Venables
Issue: 8100 / Categories: Features , Family , Divorce , Technology
printer mail-detail

When couples turn sleuth…

203846
Candid camera? Henry Venables highlights the increasing sophistication of spyware in family cases

Spying in spousal or family relationships has always occurred to some extent, but the increasing affordability and accessibility of spyware, the evolution of technology, and blurred lines around acceptable and unacceptable forms of tracking are all factors that have contributed to the rise in spying in recent years. There has been a significant uptick in the percentage of cases in which one spouse is spying on the other—from approximately 20% in my firm in 2022 to around 40% in 2023.

Traditionally, clients would provide audio recordings or CCTV footage, but as technology continues to develop, the type of equipment used in a family law context is constantly changing. Now, we often see cases involving dash cams, car trackers and even secret cameras hidden in soft toys.

We’ve also recently been made aware of an iPhone charging device containing a micro-transmitter that enables spyware to be deployed and data to be accessed from a phone on charge. While this

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson appoints Vicky Tomlinson as Head of Independent Health and Care

DWF—five appointments

DWF—five appointments

DWF further strengthens major injury and casualty offering with new partner and four directors from DAC Beachcroft

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis strengthens Grimsby child care team

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll