header-logo header-logo

When couples turn sleuth…

17 January 2025 / Henry Venables
Issue: 8100 / Categories: Features , Family , Divorce , Technology
printer mail-detail
203846
Candid camera? Henry Venables highlights the increasing sophistication of spyware in family cases

Spying in spousal or family relationships has always occurred to some extent, but the increasing affordability and accessibility of spyware, the evolution of technology, and blurred lines around acceptable and unacceptable forms of tracking are all factors that have contributed to the rise in spying in recent years. There has been a significant uptick in the percentage of cases in which one spouse is spying on the other—from approximately 20% in my firm in 2022 to around 40% in 2023.

Traditionally, clients would provide audio recordings or CCTV footage, but as technology continues to develop, the type of equipment used in a family law context is constantly changing. Now, we often see cases involving dash cams, car trackers and even secret cameras hidden in soft toys.

We’ve also recently been made aware of an iPhone charging device containing a micro-transmitter that enables spyware to be deployed and data to be accessed from a phone on charge. While this

To access this full article please fill the form below.
All fields are mandatory unless marked as 'Optional'.
If you already a subscriber to New Law Journal, please login here

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Partner hire bolstersprivate capital and global aviation finance offering

Morae—Carla Mendy

Morae—Carla Mendy

Digital and business solutions firm appoints chief operating officer

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Set welcomes two experienced juniors as new tenants

NEWS
The High Court’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has thrown the careers of experienced CILEX litigators into jeopardy, warns Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers in NLJ this week
Sir Brian Leveson’s claim that there is ‘no right to jury trial’ erects a constitutional straw man, argues Professor Graham Zellick KC in NLJ this week. He argues that Leveson dismantles a position almost no-one truly holds, and thereby obscures the deeper issue: the jury’s place within the UK’s constitutional tradition
Why have private prosecutions surged despite limited data? Niall Hearty of Rahman Ravelli explores their rise in this week's NLJ 
The public law team at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer surveys significant recent human rights and judicial review rulings in this week's NLJ
In this week's NLJ, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley examines how debarring orders, while attractive to claimants seeking swift resolution, can complicate trials—most notably in fraud cases requiring ‘particularly cogent’ proof
back-to-top-scroll