header-logo header-logo

When freedom trumps privacy

10 June 2011 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 7469 / Categories: Opinion , Freedom of Information
printer mail-detail

Nicholas Dobson considers the privacy v freedom of expression conflict in light of Mosley

While the law struggles to catch up with the global immediacy and openness of the Twittersphere, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) has delivered a thoughtful judgment on the conflict between privacy and freedom of expression. This is, of course, the Mosley case (Mosley v United Kingdom [2011] ECHR 48009/08).

The background circumstances of the case are well known after publication of the March 2008 News of the World article: “F1 boss has sick Nazi orgy with 5 hookers”. In July 2008 Eady J had awarded Mosley £60K in damages and costs for breach of privacy in circumstances where there was no public interest or justification in the publication in question by the News of the World since he had found no Nazi connotations in Mosley’s sexual activities.

However, Mosley complained to the ECtHR that the UK had violated its positive obligations under Art 8 (right to respect for private and family life) by failing to impose

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll