When freedom trumps privacy

Nicholas Dobson considers the privacy v freedom of expression conflict in light of Mosley

While the law struggles to catch up with the global immediacy and openness of the Twittersphere, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) has delivered a thoughtful judgment on the conflict between privacy and freedom of expression. This is, of course, the Mosley case (Mosley v United Kingdom [2011] ECHR 48009/08).

The background circumstances of the case are well known after publication of the March 2008 News of the World article: “F1 boss has sick Nazi orgy with 5 hookers”. In July 2008 Eady J had awarded Mosley £60K in damages and costs for breach of privacy in circumstances where there was no public interest or justification in the publication in question by the News of the World since he had found no Nazi connotations in Mosley’s sexual activities.

However, Mosley complained to the ECtHR that the UK had violated its positive obligations under Art 8 (right to respect for private and family life) by failing to impose

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

When freedom trumps privacy

Nicholas Dobson considers the privacy v freedom of expression conflict in light of Mosley

However, Mosley complained to the ECtHR that the UK had violated its positive obligations under Art 8 (right to respect for private and family life) by failing to impose

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

SourceURL:

Links:

E-newsletter Sign-Up

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS

Read All

NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders

Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners

NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do

A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent

Your magistrates’ court needs you!

Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process

NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed

Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’

NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits

A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’

Error message

When freedom trumps privacy

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green