header-logo header-logo

10 June 2011 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 7469 / Categories: Opinion , Freedom of Information
printer mail-detail

When freedom trumps privacy

Nicholas Dobson considers the privacy v freedom of expression conflict in light of Mosley

While the law struggles to catch up with the global immediacy and openness of the Twittersphere, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) has delivered a thoughtful judgment on the conflict between privacy and freedom of expression. This is, of course, the Mosley case (Mosley v United Kingdom [2011] ECHR 48009/08).

The background circumstances of the case are well known after publication of the March 2008 News of the World article: “F1 boss has sick Nazi orgy with 5 hookers”. In July 2008 Eady J had awarded Mosley £60K in damages and costs for breach of privacy in circumstances where there was no public interest or justification in the publication in question by the News of the World since he had found no Nazi connotations in Mosley’s sexual activities.

However, Mosley complained to the ECtHR that the UK had violated its positive obligations under Art 8 (right to respect for private and family life) by failing to impose

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll