header-logo header-logo

When protection matters

14 April 2011 / Robert Eckford
Issue: 7461 + 7462 / Categories: Features , Landlord&tenant , Property
printer mail-detail

Robert Eckford explains how the Court of Protection can help with “hoarders” & unco-operative tenants

A common problem faced by social landlords is the hoarding tenant or the tenant who refuses to engage or co-operate with their landlord, or with social services in providing support for their tenancy.

Such tenants can cause significant problems for landlords. Hoarders can accumulate volumes of rubbish and clutter leading to unsafe and unhygienic conditions in the property, including posing a fire risk or leading to infestations. This in turn can affect the tenant’s neighbours and lead to complaints.

Non-engagement by a tenant can also causes problems, such as refusing to permit the landlord to enter the property for inspections or to undertake works, or refusing to pay rent. Either type of tenant is likely to be in breach of their tenancy as a result.

Injunctions

In some cases the landlord can seek an injunction from the court. This can be an effective remedy as it forces the tenant to clear their property or allows the landlord

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

Forum of Insurance Lawyers elects president for 2026

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Partner joinslabour and employment practice in London

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

NEWS
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll