header-logo header-logo

When protection matters

14 April 2011 / Robert Eckford
Issue: 7461 + 7462 / Categories: Features , Landlord&tenant , Property
printer mail-detail

Robert Eckford explains how the Court of Protection can help with “hoarders” & unco-operative tenants

A common problem faced by social landlords is the hoarding tenant or the tenant who refuses to engage or co-operate with their landlord, or with social services in providing support for their tenancy.

Such tenants can cause significant problems for landlords. Hoarders can accumulate volumes of rubbish and clutter leading to unsafe and unhygienic conditions in the property, including posing a fire risk or leading to infestations. This in turn can affect the tenant’s neighbours and lead to complaints.

Non-engagement by a tenant can also causes problems, such as refusing to permit the landlord to enter the property for inspections or to undertake works, or refusing to pay rent. Either type of tenant is likely to be in breach of their tenancy as a result.

Injunctions

In some cases the landlord can seek an injunction from the court. This can be an effective remedy as it forces the tenant to clear their property or allows the landlord

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll