header-logo header-logo

21 July 2016
Issue: 7708 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

When retailers go bankrupt

The Law Commission’s recommendation that consumers be pushed up the priority list when retailers go bust has come under fire from insolvency and restructuring trade body R3.

In a report published last week, Consumer Prepayments on Retailer Insolvency, the Commission said consumers paying a deposit of £250 or more should be moved up the priority list of creditors.

Stephen Lewis, Law Commissioner for commercial and common law, said the demise of big-name retailers such as Comet, HMV, World of Leather, MFI and Habitat showed “the problem was not going away” and consumers should have better protection.

However, R3 president Andrew Tate says: “Improving the position of one set of creditors could make it more difficult to rescue businesses.

“This would be the first major change to the order of priority of payments in insolvency proceedings in over a decade and may discourage lending to retailers, particularly those in distress.”

Issue: 7708 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll