header-logo header-logo

21 July 2016
Issue: 7708 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

When retailers go bankrupt

The Law Commission’s recommendation that consumers be pushed up the priority list when retailers go bust has come under fire from insolvency and restructuring trade body R3.

In a report published last week, Consumer Prepayments on Retailer Insolvency, the Commission said consumers paying a deposit of £250 or more should be moved up the priority list of creditors.

Stephen Lewis, Law Commissioner for commercial and common law, said the demise of big-name retailers such as Comet, HMV, World of Leather, MFI and Habitat showed “the problem was not going away” and consumers should have better protection.

However, R3 president Andrew Tate says: “Improving the position of one set of creditors could make it more difficult to rescue businesses.

“This would be the first major change to the order of priority of payments in insolvency proceedings in over a decade and may discourage lending to retailers, particularly those in distress.”

Issue: 7708 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll