header-logo header-logo

Where are all the accountants?

12 November 2010 / Maggie Stilwell
Issue: 7441 / Categories: Opinion , Arbitration
printer mail-detail

Arbitrations offer the parties engaged in a dispute some choice in the selection of arbitrators

Maggie Stilwell presents the arguments for accountants as arbitrators
Arbitrations offer the parties engaged in a dispute some choice in the selection of arbitrators. Even though there is a wide range of commercial cases and issues resolved through arbitration, it is striking how lawyers dominate these appointments, over other professionals or lay people with experience relevant to the case. As an accountant, I am interested in why this is so, even for cases where accounting, financial or commercial issues are central. It is customary for accountants to give expert evidence in arbitrations, but far less usual for them to act as an arbitrator. And yet a proper mastery of the accounting, financial and commercial aspects can be so important to the quality of the decisions reached in arbitrations.

Damages

Clearly, most arbitrations involve disputed legal issues, requiring the expertise of a lawyer to resolve them. But in a panel of three or more arbitrators, does that mean that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll