header-logo header-logo

Where the heart is

23 September 2010 / Richard Scorer
Issue: 7434 / Categories: Features , Personal injury , Community care
printer mail-detail
pi_0_4

Richard Scorer asks who cares best? Home or hospice?

It has long been accepted in personal injury claims that an injured claimant may seek damages from the tortfeasor in respect of gratuitous care provided by family members and friends. Provided such care was reasonably required, the court assesses and awards a reasonable sum. This is a sensible and fair rule: most people who are injured do not have the money to pay for professional nursing care, and are therefore dependent on friends and family to meet their care needs. In legal terms, the loss belongs to the carer not to the claimant; the damages are therefore held on trust for the carer.

In serious injury cases, particularly industrial disease claims where the claimant’s condition leads to a progressive deterioration with increasing levels of pain, the claimant’s care in the final stages of the illness may often be provided by a hospice. Mesothelioma is an asbestos related cancer arising from the inhalation of asbestos fibres, leading to lung disease. The condition is incurable

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll