header-logo header-logo

Where the heart is

23 September 2010 / Richard Scorer
Issue: 7434 / Categories: Features , Personal injury , Community care
printer mail-detail
pi_0_4

Richard Scorer asks who cares best? Home or hospice?

It has long been accepted in personal injury claims that an injured claimant may seek damages from the tortfeasor in respect of gratuitous care provided by family members and friends. Provided such care was reasonably required, the court assesses and awards a reasonable sum. This is a sensible and fair rule: most people who are injured do not have the money to pay for professional nursing care, and are therefore dependent on friends and family to meet their care needs. In legal terms, the loss belongs to the carer not to the claimant; the damages are therefore held on trust for the carer.

In serious injury cases, particularly industrial disease claims where the claimant’s condition leads to a progressive deterioration with increasing levels of pain, the claimant’s care in the final stages of the illness may often be provided by a hospice. Mesothelioma is an asbestos related cancer arising from the inhalation of asbestos fibres, leading to lung disease. The condition is incurable

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll