header-logo header-logo

23 September 2010 / Richard Scorer
Issue: 7434 / Categories: Features , Personal injury , Community care
printer mail-detail

Where the heart is

pi_0_4

Richard Scorer asks who cares best? Home or hospice?

It has long been accepted in personal injury claims that an injured claimant may seek damages from the tortfeasor in respect of gratuitous care provided by family members and friends. Provided such care was reasonably required, the court assesses and awards a reasonable sum. This is a sensible and fair rule: most people who are injured do not have the money to pay for professional nursing care, and are therefore dependent on friends and family to meet their care needs. In legal terms, the loss belongs to the carer not to the claimant; the damages are therefore held on trust for the carer.

In serious injury cases, particularly industrial disease claims where the claimant’s condition leads to a progressive deterioration with increasing levels of pain, the claimant’s care in the final stages of the illness may often be provided by a hospice. Mesothelioma is an asbestos related cancer arising from the inhalation of asbestos fibres, leading to lung disease. The condition is incurable

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll