header-logo header-logo

23 September 2010 / Richard Scorer
Issue: 7434 / Categories: Features , Personal injury , Community care
printer mail-detail

Where the heart is

pi_0_4

Richard Scorer asks who cares best? Home or hospice?

It has long been accepted in personal injury claims that an injured claimant may seek damages from the tortfeasor in respect of gratuitous care provided by family members and friends. Provided such care was reasonably required, the court assesses and awards a reasonable sum. This is a sensible and fair rule: most people who are injured do not have the money to pay for professional nursing care, and are therefore dependent on friends and family to meet their care needs. In legal terms, the loss belongs to the carer not to the claimant; the damages are therefore held on trust for the carer.

In serious injury cases, particularly industrial disease claims where the claimant’s condition leads to a progressive deterioration with increasing levels of pain, the claimant’s care in the final stages of the illness may often be provided by a hospice. Mesothelioma is an asbestos related cancer arising from the inhalation of asbestos fibres, leading to lung disease. The condition is incurable

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll