header-logo header-logo

Which way to go?

19 June 2008 / Michael Zander KC
Issue: 7326 / Categories: Features , Legal services , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-detail

Michael Zander QC reflects on the negative response to Lord Carter's sentencing proposals

The Carter Report on sentencing must be a contender for the title of “Worst Report of Recent Years”. Lord Carter made two main recommendations: build more prisons; and adopt a Minnesota-style structured sentencing grid system. He did little research or consultation. In particular, he failed even to mention the New Zealand system despite the fact that New Zealand has for the past several years been engaged in a major sentencing reform project.

The consultation paper issued by the Working Group established to pursue Carter's sentencing proposal was plainly driven by Carter's approach—indeed the circuit judges in their response went so far as to say that the questions were carefully worded… “suggestive of a decision already taken”. This no doubt was due to the fact that the leader of the secretariat and several of her team had worked on the Carter report. Incredibly, the consultation paper also failed to consider the New Zealand system.

At the time, one

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Laytons ETL—Scott Hilton & Simon Jones

Laytons ETL—Scott Hilton & Simon Jones

City firm launches real estate corporate team to meet growing client demand

Talbots Law—Clare Regan & Lucy George

Talbots Law—Clare Regan & Lucy George

Midlands firm appointshead of real estate development

Charles Russell Speechlys—Libby Elliott

Charles Russell Speechlys—Libby Elliott

Corporate, restructuring and insolvency offering grows with partner hire

NEWS
Government plans for offender ‘restriction zones’ risk creating ‘digital cages’ that blur punishment with surveillance, warns Henrietta Ronson, partner at Corker Binning, in this week's issue of NLJ
Louise Uphill, senior associate at Moore Barlow LLP, dissects the faltering rollout of the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 in this week's NLJ
Judgments are ‘worthless without enforcement’, says HHJ Karen Walden-Smith, senior circuit judge and chair of the Civil Justice Council’s enforcement working group. In this week's NLJ, she breaks down the CJC’s April 2025 report, which identified systemic flaws and proposed 39 reforms, from modernising procedures to protecting vulnerable debtors
Writing in NLJ this week, Katherine Harding and Charlotte Finley of Penningtons Manches Cooper examine Standish v Standish [2025] UKSC 26, the Supreme Court ruling that narrowed what counts as matrimonial property, and its potential impact upon claims under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975
In this week's NLJ, Dr Jon Robins, editor of The Justice Gap and lecturer at Brighton University, reports on a campaign to posthumously exonerate Christine Keeler. 60 years after her perjury conviction, Keeler’s son Seymour Platt has petitioned the king to exercise the royal prerogative of mercy, arguing she was a victim of violence and moral hypocrisy, not deceit. Supported by Felicity Gerry KC, the dossier brands the conviction 'the ultimate in slut-shaming'
back-to-top-scroll