header-logo header-logo

13 December 2012
Issue: 7542 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Whiplash backlash

Injured will have to go “head to head” in court

The small-claims threshold for whiplash and road-traffic claims could be raised from £1,000 to £5,000, under Ministry of Justice (MoJ) proposals to curb the number of fraudulent claims. The MoJ consultation, Reducing the Number and Costs of Whiplash Claims, also proposes setting up independent medical panels to determine whether claims are genuine.

According to James Dalton, head of motor and liability insurance at the Association of British Insurers, 1,500 whiplash claims are made each day, adding £90 to the average annual motor insurance premium. He says: “More effective diagnosis of whiplash will help genuine claimants get paid out quickly and reduce the scope for fraud.”

However, Iain Stark, chairman of the Association of Costs Lawyers, says the proposals “could spell disaster for both consumers and the legal profession. Access to justice will be the ultimate victim. I foresee a whole new unregulated industry being created to handle claims below £5,000. Furthermore, the courts will be flooded with litigants in person, which will put huge strain on their already limited resources”. He adds: “It is said that we all pay an extra £90 on our insurance because of whiplash claims and so the government must hold insurers to account if premiums do not fall as a result. And maybe the authorities should do more to prosecute those bringing fraudulent claims.”

Claimant lawyers also oppose the plans. Mark Grover, chief executive of personal injury firm Antony Hodari & Co, says: “Though fraud is a problem, the vast majority of claims are legitimate; raising the small-claims limit will just mean that an injured person will have to go head to head in court against the insurer’s lawyer. How many of us would want to do that?”

Issue: 7542 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers to be joined by leading family law set, 4 Brick Court, this summer

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Real estate and construction energy offering boosted by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Firm bolsters real estate team with partner hire in Birmingham

NEWS
A wave of housing and procedural reforms is set to test the limits of tribunal capacity. In his latest Civil Way column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold charts sweeping change as the Renters’ Rights Act 2025 begins biting
Plans to reduce jury trials risk missing the real problem in the criminal justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, David Wolchover of Ridgeway Chambers argues the crown court backlog is fuelled not by juries but weak cases slipping through a flawed ‘50%’ prosecution test
Emerging technologies may soon transform how courts determine truth in deeply personal disputes. In this week's NLJ, Madhavi Kabra of 1 Hare Court and Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers explore how neurotechnology could reshape family law
A controversial protest case has reignited debate over the limits of free expression. In NLJ this week, Nicholas Dobson examines a Quran-burning incident testing public order law
The courts have drawn a firm line under attempts to extend arbitration appeals. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed of the University of Leicester highlights that if the High Court refuses permission under s 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996, that is the end
back-to-top-scroll