header-logo header-logo

15 February 2018
Issue: 7781 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Whiplash reforms divisive

Small claims limit for RTAs set to be raised to £5,000

Controversial whiplash reforms could come in as early as April next year, ministry officials have confirmed to solicitors.

The Motor Accident Solicitors Society (MASS) has revealed ministers confirmed at a meeting this week that they plan to introduce tariffs for soft tissue or whiplash injuries in April 2019. The plan is dependent on the Civil Liability Bill progressing through Parliament in time.

The small claims limit for road traffic accident cases would be raised from £1,000 to £5,000 via secondary legislation at the same time. MASS say most claimants would not then be able to access legal representation, as costs cannot be recovered in the small claims court.

Simon Stanfield, chair of MASS, said MASS would fight the plans but warned that, if approved, there were ‘still huge questions about how it would be implemented, operated and how the worst consequences can be limited. There is an enormous amount for the government to sort out if it is to hit its April 2019 target date’.

Patrick Allen, senior partner of Hodge Jones & Allen, described the reforms as ‘misconceived’.

‘The reforms will put significant impediments in the way of claimants seeking justice for smaller personal injury claims and would appear to be caught by the Supreme Court’s statement in last July’s Unison case that, without unimpeded access to justice, the democratic process was in danger of becoming “a meaningless charade”,’ he said.

‘Therefore, the government may struggle to persuade Parliament or the courts that the proposed reforms are lawful.’

However, insurance lawyer Deborah Newberry, head of public affairs at Kennedys, welcomed the news.

‘For compensators, including insurers, the uncertainty around the Civil Liability Bill has understandably been a source of considerable frustration—compounded by the uncertainty around the domestic reform agenda more broadly and the UK’s exit from the EU.’

Issue: 7781 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll