header-logo header-logo

22 March 2023
Issue: 8018 / Categories: Legal News , Personal injury , Damages , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Whiplash settlements at slow pace

Personal injury lawyers have highlighted problems with the Official Injury Claims (OIC) portal, including a rise in the average settlement time.

The OIC, which launched alongside wider whiplash reforms in May 2021, is used for road traffic accident injury claims worth less than £5,000. 

According to quarterly data (up to December 2022) published by the OIC last week, the volume of cases is rising, with 22,630 claims during the quarter compared to a total of 76,873 since it launched.

However, the figures also show a steady rise in the average settlement time from 45.2 days in the OIC’s first quarter after launch to, in subsequent quarters, 85 days, 139 days, 175 days, 208 days and, in the most recent quarter, 227 days.

The OIC report states: ‘This is to be expected as we are now seeing cases settle with more complex injuries and longer prognoses. It is likely to continue to rise.’

The Justice Committee began an inquiry last month into the impact of the 2021 whiplash reforms and how well the OIC is working. Submitting evidence this week, CILEX warned the rise in settlement times with cases taking three-quarters of a year to resolve is ‘being seen as a norm’.

CILEX questioned the accessibility of the portal for unrepresented lay claimants, who are often unable to ‘effectively collate’ the evidence, particularly since claims may be complex and intricate. Moreover, 88% of OIC claimants are legally represented but there is no costs recovery; therefore clients must pay lawyers out of their damages, which makes the work less financially viable, resulting in small and medium-sized firms dropping out of the whiplash claims market.

CILEX president Matthew Huggett said: ‘We would like to see better legal education, advice and guidance for those using the portal and ongoing monitoring to ensure that consumer choice is not being compromised.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Firm welcomes partner with specialist expertise in family and art law

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Dual-qualified partner joins international private client team

NEWS
Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
back-to-top-scroll