header-logo header-logo

Whiplash settlements at slow pace

22 March 2023
Issue: 8018 / Categories: Legal News , Personal injury , Damages , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail
Personal injury lawyers have highlighted problems with the Official Injury Claims (OIC) portal, including a rise in the average settlement time.

The OIC, which launched alongside wider whiplash reforms in May 2021, is used for road traffic accident injury claims worth less than £5,000. 

According to quarterly data (up to December 2022) published by the OIC last week, the volume of cases is rising, with 22,630 claims during the quarter compared to a total of 76,873 since it launched.

However, the figures also show a steady rise in the average settlement time from 45.2 days in the OIC’s first quarter after launch to, in subsequent quarters, 85 days, 139 days, 175 days, 208 days and, in the most recent quarter, 227 days.

The OIC report states: ‘This is to be expected as we are now seeing cases settle with more complex injuries and longer prognoses. It is likely to continue to rise.’

The Justice Committee began an inquiry last month into the impact of the 2021 whiplash reforms and how well the OIC is working. Submitting evidence this week, CILEX warned the rise in settlement times with cases taking three-quarters of a year to resolve is ‘being seen as a norm’.

CILEX questioned the accessibility of the portal for unrepresented lay claimants, who are often unable to ‘effectively collate’ the evidence, particularly since claims may be complex and intricate. Moreover, 88% of OIC claimants are legally represented but there is no costs recovery; therefore clients must pay lawyers out of their damages, which makes the work less financially viable, resulting in small and medium-sized firms dropping out of the whiplash claims market.

CILEX president Matthew Huggett said: ‘We would like to see better legal education, advice and guidance for those using the portal and ongoing monitoring to ensure that consumer choice is not being compromised.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll