header-logo header-logo

15 February 2023
Issue: 8013 / Categories: Legal News , Personal injury , Damages , Insurance / reinsurance , Technology
printer mail-detail

Whiplash claims revisited

MPs have begun an inquiry into whether whiplash claims are being processed effectively following a series of reforms.

Personal injury lawyers campaigned against the reforms when they were announced in 2021, fearing claimants might be under-compensated and lose access to justice.

The reforms included fixed tariffs, a ban on claims without medical evidence, raising the small claims threshold from £1,000 to £5,000, and the online claims portal or Official Injury Claim Service. The aim was to halve the more than £2bn annual claims for whiplash, which insurers said added £90 to car insurance policies. Savings of between £40 and £50 per year were then to be passed on to motorists.

Sir Bob Neill, chair of the Justice Committee, said: ‘We want justice to prevail, but we want it to be efficient as well.’

The committee will ask why 90% of claimants continue to use lawyers when using the online portal, whether the portal is accessible, and whether it ensures access to justice. It will look at the effect the reforms have had on the number of minor personal injury claims to date, to what extent any savings are being passed on to motorists, and whether claims are being settled in a timely manner.

Andrew Wild, head of legal at First4InjuryClaims, said: ‘Road traffic accident claims have almost halved since 2018 but the promised savings for motorists have yet to materialise—insurance premiums have actually gone up.

‘The portal has been so poorly marketed and plagued with issues that motorists could be forgiven for giving up, particularly when the average settlement time currently stands at more than seven months.

‘An inquiry into the reforms has to be welcomed but, almost two years in, I hope this is not simply a box ticking exercise.’

Submit evidence to the inquiry by 5pm on 17 March.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
The legal profession’s claim to be a ‘guardian of fairness’ is under scrutiny after stark findings on gender imbalance and opaque progression. Writing in NLJ this week, Joshua Purser of No5 Barristers’ Chambers and Govindi Deerasinghe of Global 50/50 warn that leadership remains dominated by a narrow elite, with men holding 71% of top court roles
A legal challenge to police disclosure rules has failed, reinforcing a push for transparency in policing. In NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth examines a case where the Metropolitan Police required officers to declare membership of groups like the Freemasons
Bereavement leave is undergoing a quiet but profound transformation. Writing in NLJ this week, Robert Hargreaves of York St John University explains how the Employment Rights Act 2025 introduces a day-one right to leave for a wider range of losses, alongside new provisions for pregnancy loss and bereaved partners
Courts are beginning to grapple with whether AI-generated material is legally privileged—and the answers are mixed. In this week's issue of NLJ, Stacie Bourton, Tom Whittaker & Beata Kolodziej of Burges Salmon examine US rulings showing how easily privilege can be lost
New guidance seeks to bring order to the growing use of artificial intelligence (AI) in expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Minesh Tanna and David Bridge of Simmons & Simmons set out a framework stressing ‘transparency’, ‘explainability’ and ‘reliability’
back-to-top-scroll