header-logo header-logo

Whiplash claims revisited

15 February 2023
Issue: 8013 / Categories: Legal News , Personal injury , Damages , Insurance / reinsurance , Technology
printer mail-detail
MPs have begun an inquiry into whether whiplash claims are being processed effectively following a series of reforms.

Personal injury lawyers campaigned against the reforms when they were announced in 2021, fearing claimants might be under-compensated and lose access to justice.

The reforms included fixed tariffs, a ban on claims without medical evidence, raising the small claims threshold from £1,000 to £5,000, and the online claims portal or Official Injury Claim Service. The aim was to halve the more than £2bn annual claims for whiplash, which insurers said added £90 to car insurance policies. Savings of between £40 and £50 per year were then to be passed on to motorists.

Sir Bob Neill, chair of the Justice Committee, said: ‘We want justice to prevail, but we want it to be efficient as well.’

The committee will ask why 90% of claimants continue to use lawyers when using the online portal, whether the portal is accessible, and whether it ensures access to justice. It will look at the effect the reforms have had on the number of minor personal injury claims to date, to what extent any savings are being passed on to motorists, and whether claims are being settled in a timely manner.

Andrew Wild, head of legal at First4InjuryClaims, said: ‘Road traffic accident claims have almost halved since 2018 but the promised savings for motorists have yet to materialise—insurance premiums have actually gone up.

‘The portal has been so poorly marketed and plagued with issues that motorists could be forgiven for giving up, particularly when the average settlement time currently stands at more than seven months.

‘An inquiry into the reforms has to be welcomed but, almost two years in, I hope this is not simply a box ticking exercise.’

Submit evidence to the inquiry by 5pm on 17 March.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Myers & Co—Jen Goodwin

Myers & Co—Jen Goodwin

Head of corporate promoted to director

Boies Schiller Flexner—Lindsay Reimschussel

Boies Schiller Flexner—Lindsay Reimschussel

Firm strengthens international arbitration team with key London hire

Corker Binning—Priya Dave

Corker Binning—Priya Dave

FCA contentious financial regulation lawyer joins the team as of counsel

NEWS
Social media giants should face tortious liability for the psychological harms their platforms inflict, argues Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers in this week’s NLJ
The Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024—once heralded as a breakthrough—has instead plunged leaseholders into confusion, warns Shabnam Ali-Khan of Russell-Cooke in this week’s NLJ
The Employment Appeal Tribunal has now confirmed that offering a disabled employee a trial period in an alternative role can itself be a 'reasonable adjustment' under the Equality Act 2010: in this week's NLJ, Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve analyses the evolving case law
Caroline Shea KC and Richard Miller of Falcon Chambers examine the growing judicial focus on 'cynical breach' in restrictive covenant cases, in this week's issue of NLJ
Ian Gascoigne of LexisNexis dissects the uneasy balance between open justice and confidentiality in England’s civil courts, in this week's NLJ. From public hearings to super-injunctions, he identifies five tiers of privacy—from fully open proceedings to entirely secret ones—showing how a patchwork of exceptions has evolved without clear design
back-to-top-scroll