header-logo header-logo

23 September 2016 / Peter Breakey
Issue: 7715 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Whistleblowing protection

nlj_7715_breakey

Peter Breakey heralds a small but welcome extension to the scope of protection for whistleblowers

  • A claimant’s status as a worker vis à vis an agency they are employed under is irrelevant to a claim against a trust that the worker provides services for.

The rules designed to protect whistleblowers have repeatedly proved to be inadequate. A recent decision in the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT), which will apply to many NHS agency workers, provides a small but welcome extension of their scope. In McTigue v University Hospital Bristol NHS Foundation Trust UKEAT/0354/15/JOJ, Ms McTigue (the claimant) was a nurse employed by an agency (the agency) which provided services to the University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust (the trust). From 2011, she had been working with victims of sexual assaults. In 2013 she was removed from this work. She argued that her removal from this work was a detriment which she had suffered as a result of a protected disclosure she had made to the trust. It was therefore a breach of her right under

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll