header-logo header-logo

13 May 2016
Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

White paper for a new BBC

The BBC trust will be replaced by a board whose chair, deputy chair and four nation members will be appointed by the government, under the government White Paper, A BBC for the future: a broadcaster of distinction.

The rest of the 12-14 member board will be appointed by the BBC. Pay-TV BBC may be introduced to provide another stream of income, and will be restricted to “additional services” not currently provided. One potentially controversial change is the decision to allow independent producers to make 100% of non-news programmes (the limit is currently 50%). 

“The government has finally unveiled its much-anticipated White Paper on the renewal of the BBC's charter,” said media barrister Athelstane Aamodt, of 4-5 Gray’s Inn Square, who previously worked at the BBC. 

“Much of it is uncontroversial. For starters, the licence fee stays. This was always going to be the biggest issue, and the BBC keeps its ability to raise £3.7bn per year from the public.

“The White Paper is not a Bill and it will not be voted on by Parliament, and the renewed charter will be approved by the Privy Council. There will however be a (no doubt vigorous) debate in the House of Commons. 

“The biggest issue will undoubtedly be the composition of the new ‘unitary board’, a portion of which will be appointed by the government. The idea of the government appointing members to such a board is bound to cause unease and will be perceived as political interference in the affairs of a broadcaster that is meant to be scrupulously impartial.”

Star salaries over £450,000 (not £150,000 as previously feared) will be disclosed in a move towards more transparency.

Another headline change is Culture Secretary John Whittingdale’s insistence that popularity should not be the main measure of success for the BBC. Instead, the new charter would require the BBC’s output to be “distinctive, high quality and impartial”.

 

Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll