header-logo header-logo

05 March 2014 / Louis Flannery KC
Issue: 7597 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

Who killed Alexander Litvinenko?

web_flannery

Louis Flannery examines the implications of the latest ruling in relation to the Litvinenko affair

Few reading this will fail to recall the well-publicised circumstances of Mr Litvinenko’s death from radiation poisoning in London in late 2006. The conspiracy theories still abound, but the prime suspects, in respect of whom arrest warrants and extradition requests were made, are Russian agents who remain at large in Moscow.

 

Mr Litvinenko himself had spent more than 18 years in the KGB, before turning whistleblower and having to flee Russia in 2000. He had fallen out with his paymasters in 1998, after declaring publicly that he had been ordered by the Kremlin to assassinate the late Russian oligarch Boris Berezovsky, who fled from Russia in 1999. (The media magnate was found dead in the bathroom of his Berkshire mansion last year, apparently from suicide, following his loss in the mammoth Commercial Court trial against Abramovich (see “Rich Pickings” Pt I & Pt II)

The inquest

A week after Mr Litvinenko passed away, an inquest

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll