header-logo header-logo

05 March 2014 / Louis Flannery KC
Issue: 7597 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

Who killed Alexander Litvinenko?

web_flannery

Louis Flannery examines the implications of the latest ruling in relation to the Litvinenko affair

Few reading this will fail to recall the well-publicised circumstances of Mr Litvinenko’s death from radiation poisoning in London in late 2006. The conspiracy theories still abound, but the prime suspects, in respect of whom arrest warrants and extradition requests were made, are Russian agents who remain at large in Moscow.

 

Mr Litvinenko himself had spent more than 18 years in the KGB, before turning whistleblower and having to flee Russia in 2000. He had fallen out with his paymasters in 1998, after declaring publicly that he had been ordered by the Kremlin to assassinate the late Russian oligarch Boris Berezovsky, who fled from Russia in 1999. (The media magnate was found dead in the bathroom of his Berkshire mansion last year, apparently from suicide, following his loss in the mammoth Commercial Court trial against Abramovich (see “Rich Pickings” Pt I & Pt II)

The inquest

A week after Mr Litvinenko passed away, an inquest

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll