header-logo header-logo

05 March 2014 / Louis Flannery KC
Issue: 7597 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

Who killed Alexander Litvinenko?

web_flannery

Louis Flannery examines the implications of the latest ruling in relation to the Litvinenko affair

Few reading this will fail to recall the well-publicised circumstances of Mr Litvinenko’s death from radiation poisoning in London in late 2006. The conspiracy theories still abound, but the prime suspects, in respect of whom arrest warrants and extradition requests were made, are Russian agents who remain at large in Moscow.

 

Mr Litvinenko himself had spent more than 18 years in the KGB, before turning whistleblower and having to flee Russia in 2000. He had fallen out with his paymasters in 1998, after declaring publicly that he had been ordered by the Kremlin to assassinate the late Russian oligarch Boris Berezovsky, who fled from Russia in 1999. (The media magnate was found dead in the bathroom of his Berkshire mansion last year, apparently from suicide, following his loss in the mammoth Commercial Court trial against Abramovich (see “Rich Pickings” Pt I & Pt II)

The inquest

A week after Mr Litvinenko passed away, an inquest

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll