header-logo header-logo

Who pulls the strings?

26 April 2013 / Rod Cowper , Michael Twomey
Issue: 7557 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail
hires2

Rod Cowper & Michael Twomey study the latest approach to piercing the veil

The Supreme Court in VTB Capital plc v Nutritek International Corp [2013] UKSC 5, [2013] 1 All ER 1296 decisively rejected the suggestion that a person who controls a company can be made liable as a party to a contract entered into by that company. However, although the Supreme Court declined the opportunity for a more general review of the corporate veil doctrine, the doctrine did not emerge unscathed.

Facts of VTB

VTB lent Russagroprom LLC (RAP) US$225m for RAP to buy Russian dairy companies from Nutritek International Corp. The facility agreement contained an English Court jurisdiction clause. Nutritek’s shareholders were two BVI companies, both owned and controlled by Mr Malofeev (M), a Russian businessman.

RAP defaulted and VTB believed its security was only worth US$32m to US$40m. It claimed that it was induced to enter into the agreement by fraudulent misrepresentations made by Nutritek for which the BVI companies and M were jointly and severally liable. VTB wished

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Writing in NLJ this week, Thomas Rothwell and Kavish Shah of Falcon Chambers unpack the surprise inclusion of a ban on upwards-only rent reviews in the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll