header-logo header-logo

06 December 2013 / Catherine Leech
Issue: 7587 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Who’s to blame?

The Supreme Court’s ruling that a school’s duty of care to a pupil is non-delegable is a significant development in tort, says Catherine Leech

In Woodland v Essex County Council [2013] UKSC 66, [2013] All ER (D) 252 (Oct) , Lady Hale confirms that the Supreme Court is “accepting an invitation to develop the law beyond the point which it has currently reached in this jurisdiction”.

In 2000, Annie Woodland was a primary school pupil who went to school at Whitmore Junior School a healthy, happy 10-year-old. She was in a hospital bed with brain damage at the end of the school day. Annie had suffered a near-drowning incident during the course of a school swimming lesson held at the local swimming baths. The lesson was part of the national curriculum. The children were taught by swimming teachers from Direct Swimming Services (DSS), a firm run by Beryl Stopford. She engaged various people to be swimming teachers and life guards. It transpires that several of these teachers were not insured, and neither was DSS.

The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll