header-logo header-logo

06 December 2013 / Catherine Leech
Issue: 7587 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Who’s to blame?

The Supreme Court’s ruling that a school’s duty of care to a pupil is non-delegable is a significant development in tort, says Catherine Leech

In Woodland v Essex County Council [2013] UKSC 66, [2013] All ER (D) 252 (Oct) , Lady Hale confirms that the Supreme Court is “accepting an invitation to develop the law beyond the point which it has currently reached in this jurisdiction”.

In 2000, Annie Woodland was a primary school pupil who went to school at Whitmore Junior School a healthy, happy 10-year-old. She was in a hospital bed with brain damage at the end of the school day. Annie had suffered a near-drowning incident during the course of a school swimming lesson held at the local swimming baths. The lesson was part of the national curriculum. The children were taught by swimming teachers from Direct Swimming Services (DSS), a firm run by Beryl Stopford. She engaged various people to be swimming teachers and life guards. It transpires that several of these teachers were not insured, and neither was DSS.

The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DAC Beachcroft—Clare Dewar

DAC Beachcroft—Clare Dewar

DAC Beachcroft strengthens Scottish real estate capabilitywith partner appointment

Womble Bond Dickinson—Brendan Ryan

Womble Bond Dickinson—Brendan Ryan

Womble Bond Dickinson appoints Brendan Ryan as partner in Public Law Projects team

Parklane Plowden Chambers—five appointments

Parklane Plowden Chambers—five appointments

Parklane Plowden Chambers welcomes five new barristers

NEWS
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
Police powers targeting concealed identities at protests come with procedural conditions that could determine whether prosecutions succeed
back-to-top-scroll