header-logo header-logo

06 November 2014 / Stephanie Cope
Issue: 7629 / Categories: Features , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Who’s to judge?

cope

Stephanie Cope considers the Court of Appeal’s stance on Equality Act assessors in Cary

The Equality Act 2010 (the Act) provides legal protection for individuals subjected to unlawful treatment. The Act aims to simplify and strengthen legal protection from discrimination by consolidating and amending existing legislation. It continues and unifies provisions for the appointment of assessors to assist the court in discrimination cases. The Act applies to claims of unlawful treatment after 1 October 2010. Claims relating to conduct prior to this date must be pursued under the legislation in force at the time. Some of the previous provisions were silent on the appointment of assessors. This includes the Equality Act (Sexual Orientation) Regulations 2007 (SI 2007/1263) (EASOR) which were considered in Cary v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis [2014] EWCA Civ 987. The treatment of which the claimant, Mr Cary, complained occurred prior to the introduction of the Act and thus fell under EASOR. However, the court sought assistance from the Act and the case provides useful guidance and a timely reminder

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll