header-logo header-logo

06 November 2014 / Stephanie Cope
Issue: 7629 / Categories: Features , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Who’s to judge?

cope

Stephanie Cope considers the Court of Appeal’s stance on Equality Act assessors in Cary

The Equality Act 2010 (the Act) provides legal protection for individuals subjected to unlawful treatment. The Act aims to simplify and strengthen legal protection from discrimination by consolidating and amending existing legislation. It continues and unifies provisions for the appointment of assessors to assist the court in discrimination cases. The Act applies to claims of unlawful treatment after 1 October 2010. Claims relating to conduct prior to this date must be pursued under the legislation in force at the time. Some of the previous provisions were silent on the appointment of assessors. This includes the Equality Act (Sexual Orientation) Regulations 2007 (SI 2007/1263) (EASOR) which were considered in Cary v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis [2014] EWCA Civ 987. The treatment of which the claimant, Mr Cary, complained occurred prior to the introduction of the Act and thus fell under EASOR. However, the court sought assistance from the Act and the case provides useful guidance and a timely reminder

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll