header-logo header-logo

06 November 2014 / Stephanie Cope
Issue: 7629 / Categories: Features , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Who’s to judge?

cope

Stephanie Cope considers the Court of Appeal’s stance on Equality Act assessors in Cary

The Equality Act 2010 (the Act) provides legal protection for individuals subjected to unlawful treatment. The Act aims to simplify and strengthen legal protection from discrimination by consolidating and amending existing legislation. It continues and unifies provisions for the appointment of assessors to assist the court in discrimination cases. The Act applies to claims of unlawful treatment after 1 October 2010. Claims relating to conduct prior to this date must be pursued under the legislation in force at the time. Some of the previous provisions were silent on the appointment of assessors. This includes the Equality Act (Sexual Orientation) Regulations 2007 (SI 2007/1263) (EASOR) which were considered in Cary v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis [2014] EWCA Civ 987. The treatment of which the claimant, Mr Cary, complained occurred prior to the introduction of the Act and thus fell under EASOR. However, the court sought assistance from the Act and the case provides useful guidance and a timely reminder

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
back-to-top-scroll