header-logo header-logo

Who takes the blame?

16 October 2008
Issue: 7341 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Richard Scorer examines cases of death in action

For personal injury lawyers acting for claimants in fatal accident cases, inquests can be a fruitful source of evidence for a civil claim. This is notwithstanding r 42(b) of the Coroners Rules 1984, which states that no inquest verdict should be framed in a way which appears to determine any question of civil liability. The question of whether and to what extent inquest verdicts can trespass on questions of blameworthiness and, consequently civil liability, is a particularly sensitive one in regard to military deaths. There is currently much debate in the media and the armed services themselves about whether the “military covenant” has been broken, with complaints about poor equipment, inferior housing and lack of proper healthcare for service personnel. Defective equipment is a particular concern, and many complaints have been brought into sharper focus by high-profile inquests.

Particularly newsworthy have been the inquests conducted by Andrew Walker, the assistant deputy coroner for Oxfordshire. Walker was appointed in 2006 to conduct military inquests. In the majority of military

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll