header-logo header-logo

Whoops…as the judge said

04 November 2022 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 8001 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail
99698
Dominic Regan reveals judicial slips, trips, defiance & high kicks

The law reports are bursting with tales of momentary ineptitude which result in litigation. Nobody is perfect and those who get involved in determining disputes can themselves be guilty of the occasional lapse.

Mishaps in court

One issue that went all the way up to the then House of Lords in Majrowski v Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Trust [2006] UKHL 34, [2006] 4 All ER 395 was whether an employer could be vicariously liable under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997. It was only in the course of oral argument before the highest court in the land that Lord Hope gently pointed out that the answer ‘overlooked by everybody’ (at para [44]) was to be found by reading the Act which was incidentally a model of brevity, running to just 16 sections.

Last year, three members of the Court of Appeal delivered a joint judgment in Global Energy Horizons Corporation v Gray [2021] EWCA Civ 123. At para [8], the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hamlins—Maddox Legal

Hamlins—Maddox Legal

London firm announces acquisition of corporate team

Ward Hadaway—Nik Tunley

Ward Hadaway—Nik Tunley

Head of corporate appointed following Teesside merger

Taylor Rose—Russell Jarvis

Taylor Rose—Russell Jarvis

Firm expands into banking and finance sector with newly appointed head of banking

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll