header-logo header-logo

04 November 2022 / Professor Dominic Regan
Issue: 8001 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Whoops…as the judge said

99698
Dominic Regan reveals judicial slips, trips, defiance & high kicks

The law reports are bursting with tales of momentary ineptitude which result in litigation. Nobody is perfect and those who get involved in determining disputes can themselves be guilty of the occasional lapse.

Mishaps in court

One issue that went all the way up to the then House of Lords in Majrowski v Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Trust [2006] UKHL 34, [2006] 4 All ER 395 was whether an employer could be vicariously liable under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997. It was only in the course of oral argument before the highest court in the land that Lord Hope gently pointed out that the answer ‘overlooked by everybody’ (at para [44]) was to be found by reading the Act which was incidentally a model of brevity, running to just 16 sections.

Last year, three members of the Court of Appeal delivered a joint judgment in Global Energy Horizons Corporation v Gray [2021] EWCA Civ 123. At para [8],

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll