header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
27 July 2017 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 7756 / Categories: Features , Public
printer mail-detail

Whose diary is it anyway?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Are the contents of a minister’s diary disclosable under the Freedom of Information Act? Nicholas Dobson reports

  • A ministerial diary was found on balance to be disclosable under FOIA.

On 24 May 2017 a notable piece was added to the grand jigsaw of English legal history. For it was then that the Court of Appeal agreed that a ministerial diary in the Department of Health (DOH) should be disclosed.

This followed a request under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA 2000) by a journalist (Simon Lewis) for disclosure of the diary of Andrew Lansley (former Conservative health secretary) from 12 May 2010 to 30 April 2011. As The Daily Telegraph reported: ‘Transparency campaigners say the case is of importance because the diary covers the time Mr Lansley was working on the Health and Social Care Act and allegedly subjected to extensive lobbying by private healthcare interests.’

The issue has certainly been through the legal wringer. For, after DOH had initially disclosed a redacted version of the diary, the Information Commissioner (IC) required

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: No such thing as a ‘Welsh seat’
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
NLJ this week: Jury reform risks justice for efficiency’s sake
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
NLJ this week: Crypto fightback offers ‘new frontier for law’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
NLJ this week: Time to revive the duty to report crime?
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
NLJ this week: When are experts truly ‘necessary’?
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll