header-logo header-logo

27 July 2017 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 7756 / Categories: Features , Public
printer mail-detail

Whose diary is it anyway?

Are the contents of a minister’s diary disclosable under the Freedom of Information Act? Nicholas Dobson reports

  • A ministerial diary was found on balance to be disclosable under FOIA.

On 24 May 2017 a notable piece was added to the grand jigsaw of English legal history. For it was then that the Court of Appeal agreed that a ministerial diary in the Department of Health (DOH) should be disclosed.

This followed a request under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA 2000) by a journalist (Simon Lewis) for disclosure of the diary of Andrew Lansley (former Conservative health secretary) from 12 May 2010 to 30 April 2011. As The Daily Telegraph reported: ‘Transparency campaigners say the case is of importance because the diary covers the time Mr Lansley was working on the Health and Social Care Act and allegedly subjected to extensive lobbying by private healthcare interests.’

The issue has certainly been through the legal wringer. For, after DOH had initially disclosed a redacted version of the diary, the Information Commissioner (IC) required

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson appoints Vicky Tomlinson as Head of Independent Health and Care

DWF—five appointments

DWF—five appointments

DWF further strengthens major injury and casualty offering with new partner and four directors from DAC Beachcroft

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis strengthens Grimsby child care team

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll