header-logo header-logo

20 September 2007 / Catherine Ball
Issue: 7289 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate , Mental health
printer mail-detail

Whose will?

Fee earners should be trained on the provisions of the Mental Capacity Act 2005, says Catherine Ball

The Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA 2005) sets up a legal framework that is designed to ensure that the affairs of those with mental incapacity are dealt with in the least interventionist way possible.

CODE OF PRACTICE

A Code of Practice produced by the government states that it is the duty of a person acting in any of the following roles to have regard to the code when dealing with someone who lacks capacity:- an attorney under an lasting power of attorney (LPA);
- a deputy appointed by the court;
- a person carrying out research in reliance on any provision under MCA 2005;
- an independent mental capacity advocate;
- a person in a professional capacity; or
- a person acting for remuneration.

Any lawyer dealing with someone who may not be able to make their own decisions must be aware of the code and MCA 2005—particularly if instructions are taken primarily from a third party. Departure from the code may be used

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll