header-logo header-logo

Whose will?

20 September 2007 / Catherine Ball
Issue: 7289 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate , Mental health
printer mail-detail

Fee earners should be trained on the provisions of the Mental Capacity Act 2005, says Catherine Ball

The Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA 2005) sets up a legal framework that is designed to ensure that the affairs of those with mental incapacity are dealt with in the least interventionist way possible.

CODE OF PRACTICE

A Code of Practice produced by the government states that it is the duty of a person acting in any of the following roles to have regard to the code when dealing with someone who lacks capacity:- an attorney under an lasting power of attorney (LPA);
- a deputy appointed by the court;
- a person carrying out research in reliance on any provision under MCA 2005;
- an independent mental capacity advocate;
- a person in a professional capacity; or
- a person acting for remuneration.

Any lawyer dealing with someone who may not be able to make their own decisions must be aware of the code and MCA 2005—particularly if instructions are taken primarily from a third party. Departure from the code may be used in evidence

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll