header-logo header-logo

15 September 2016 / Dr Chris Pamplin
Issue: 7714 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness , Profession
printer mail-detail

Why it pays to be flexible

Dr Chris Pamplin looks at the impact of flexible trials on expert witness work

  • Shorter Trials Scheme and its key provisions.
  • Flexible Trials Scheme and its key provisions.
  • Expert evidence.
  • Consequences for experts.

In October 2015 the Ministry of Justice launched two schemes seeking to lessen the time and expense that trials exert on its over-stretched budget. Since then, the Shorter Trials Scheme (STS) and the Flexible Trials Scheme (FTS) have been running as pilots at the Rolls Building, London and are to continue until the end of September 2017. (If you’re used to dilapidated court buildings out in the sticks, the virtual tour of the Rolls Building at https://www.judiciary.gov.uk may be an eye opener).

The aims of the FTS and the STS are set down in paras 2 and 4 of the Shorter and Flexible Trial Procedure Guide. It states that these are: “...to achieve shorter and earlier trials for business related litigation, at a reasonable and proportionate cost. The procedures should also help

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll