header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
15 September 2016 / Dr Chris Pamplin
Issue: 7714 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness , Profession
printer mail-detail

Why it pays to be flexible

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Dr Chris Pamplin looks at the impact of flexible trials on expert witness work
  • Shorter Trials Scheme and its key provisions.
  • Flexible Trials Scheme and its key provisions.
  • Expert evidence.
  • Consequences for experts.

In October 2015 the Ministry of Justice launched two schemes seeking to lessen the time and expense that trials exert on its over-stretched budget. Since then, the Shorter Trials Scheme (STS) and the Flexible Trials Scheme (FTS) have been running as pilots at the Rolls Building, London and are to continue until the end of September 2017. (If you’re used to dilapidated court buildings out in the sticks, the virtual tour of the Rolls Building at https://www.judiciary.gov.uk may be an eye opener).

The aims of the FTS and the STS are set down in paras 2 and 4 of the Shorter and Flexible Trial Procedure Guide. It states that these are: “...to achieve shorter and earlier trials for business related litigation, at a reasonable and proportionate cost. The procedures should also help

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NLJ Career Profile: Mark Hastings, Quillon Law

NLJ Career Profile: Mark Hastings, Quillon Law

Mark Hastings, founding partner of Quillon Law, on turning dreams into reality and pushing back on preconceptions about partnership

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: No such thing as a ‘Welsh seat’
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
NLJ this week: Jury reform risks justice for efficiency’s sake
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
NLJ this week: Crypto fightback offers ‘new frontier for law’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
NLJ this week: Time to revive the duty to report crime?
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
NLJ this week: When are experts truly ‘necessary’?
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll