header-logo header-logo

15 September 2016 / Dr Chris Pamplin
Issue: 7714 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness , Profession
printer mail-detail

Why it pays to be flexible

Dr Chris Pamplin looks at the impact of flexible trials on expert witness work

  • Shorter Trials Scheme and its key provisions.
  • Flexible Trials Scheme and its key provisions.
  • Expert evidence.
  • Consequences for experts.

In October 2015 the Ministry of Justice launched two schemes seeking to lessen the time and expense that trials exert on its over-stretched budget. Since then, the Shorter Trials Scheme (STS) and the Flexible Trials Scheme (FTS) have been running as pilots at the Rolls Building, London and are to continue until the end of September 2017. (If you’re used to dilapidated court buildings out in the sticks, the virtual tour of the Rolls Building at https://www.judiciary.gov.uk may be an eye opener).

The aims of the FTS and the STS are set down in paras 2 and 4 of the Shorter and Flexible Trial Procedure Guide. It states that these are: “...to achieve shorter and earlier trials for business related litigation, at a reasonable and proportionate cost. The procedures should also help

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Stephen Ward, The Barrister Group

NLJ Career Profile: Stephen Ward, The Barrister Group

From mowing lawns to life at the Bar: Stephen Ward reflects on an unconventional career

Clarke Willmott—Ben Loosemore

Clarke Willmott—Ben Loosemore

Commercial property partner joins Clarke Willmott in Southampton

Ellisons—Robert Tiffen

Ellisons—Robert Tiffen

Robert Tiffen joins Ellisons as Partner in growing Norwich office

NEWS
The Law Society RFC Festival of Sport returns next month, bringing together legal and financial services professionals for one of the sector’s largest annual sporting events
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

back-to-top-scroll