header-logo header-logo

15 September 2016 / Dr Chris Pamplin
Issue: 7714 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness , Profession
printer mail-detail

Why it pays to be flexible

Dr Chris Pamplin looks at the impact of flexible trials on expert witness work

  • Shorter Trials Scheme and its key provisions.
  • Flexible Trials Scheme and its key provisions.
  • Expert evidence.
  • Consequences for experts.

In October 2015 the Ministry of Justice launched two schemes seeking to lessen the time and expense that trials exert on its over-stretched budget. Since then, the Shorter Trials Scheme (STS) and the Flexible Trials Scheme (FTS) have been running as pilots at the Rolls Building, London and are to continue until the end of September 2017. (If you’re used to dilapidated court buildings out in the sticks, the virtual tour of the Rolls Building at https://www.judiciary.gov.uk may be an eye opener).

The aims of the FTS and the STS are set down in paras 2 and 4 of the Shorter and Flexible Trial Procedure Guide. It states that these are: “...to achieve shorter and earlier trials for business related litigation, at a reasonable and proportionate cost. The procedures should also help

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll