header-logo header-logo

19 May 2011 / John Cooper KC
Issue: 7466 / Categories: Opinion , Profession
printer mail-detail

Wig not included: a reply

John Cooper QC believes advocacy skills are an essential consideration during silk selection

It was with some sadness that I read Sir Geoffrey Bindman QC’s comment.

Firstly I congratulate him upon his acceptance of the honour, it is richly deserved for the peerless work he has undertaken in a lifetime of legal service to the public. But given his rather selective attack upon the silk appointment process, I wonder why he did accept the status. It is right that the facts should be set out clearly and his observations put into context.

The fundamentals

Sir Geoffrey’s  fundamental complaint is that the system of appointing silks is a “glorification of advocacy” and that by concentrating upon its stated aim of identifying excellence in higher court advocacy, it excludes the majority of solicitors from obtaining the status of QC. He opines that it is hard to define the skills of an advocate and in any event it does not lend itself to identifying excellent mediators.

The application forms which are required

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll