header-logo header-logo

19 May 2011 / John Cooper KC
Issue: 7466 / Categories: Opinion , Profession
printer mail-detail

Wig not included: a reply

John Cooper QC believes advocacy skills are an essential consideration during silk selection

It was with some sadness that I read Sir Geoffrey Bindman QC’s comment.

Firstly I congratulate him upon his acceptance of the honour, it is richly deserved for the peerless work he has undertaken in a lifetime of legal service to the public. But given his rather selective attack upon the silk appointment process, I wonder why he did accept the status. It is right that the facts should be set out clearly and his observations put into context.

The fundamentals

Sir Geoffrey’s  fundamental complaint is that the system of appointing silks is a “glorification of advocacy” and that by concentrating upon its stated aim of identifying excellence in higher court advocacy, it excludes the majority of solicitors from obtaining the status of QC. He opines that it is hard to define the skills of an advocate and in any event it does not lend itself to identifying excellent mediators.

The application forms which are required

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll