header-logo header-logo

Will funding plans deter family lawyers?

09 April 2009
Issue: 7364 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Family
printer mail-detail

Family

The Family Justice Council has hit back at Legal Services Commission funding proposals for legal representation and advocacy in the family justice system.

The proposals, set out in the paper, Family Legal Aid Funding from 2010, would cause delays in the resolution of cases and a shortage of lawyers to represent litigants, the council says.

In its response to the consultation, the council warns that the “illconsidered” proposals will deter lawyers from tackling publicly funded work. The family courts will come under closer scrutiny from 27 April, when accredited media are to be allowed access to family court hearings in county courts and the
High Court, subject to Parliamentary approval.

Courts will be able to restrict attendance to safeguard the welfare of children and the safety and protection of parties or witnesses. The media must be holders of the UK press card, and not just bloggers or those who write an occasional newsletter.

Justice Secretary Jack Straw said: “People need to trust the justice system. One important way is by creating a more open, transparent and accountable system while protecting children and families during a difficult and traumatic time in their lives.”

Issue: 7364 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll