header-logo header-logo

09 April 2009
Issue: 7364 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Family
printer mail-detail

Will funding plans deter family lawyers?

Family

The Family Justice Council has hit back at Legal Services Commission funding proposals for legal representation and advocacy in the family justice system.

The proposals, set out in the paper, Family Legal Aid Funding from 2010, would cause delays in the resolution of cases and a shortage of lawyers to represent litigants, the council says.

In its response to the consultation, the council warns that the “illconsidered” proposals will deter lawyers from tackling publicly funded work. The family courts will come under closer scrutiny from 27 April, when accredited media are to be allowed access to family court hearings in county courts and the
High Court, subject to Parliamentary approval.

Courts will be able to restrict attendance to safeguard the welfare of children and the safety and protection of parties or witnesses. The media must be holders of the UK press card, and not just bloggers or those who write an occasional newsletter.

Justice Secretary Jack Straw said: “People need to trust the justice system. One important way is by creating a more open, transparent and accountable system while protecting children and families during a difficult and traumatic time in their lives.”

Issue: 7364 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

Bird & Bird—Gordon Moir

Bird & Bird—Gordon Moir

London tech and comms team boosted by telecoms and regulatory hires

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

NEWS
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
back-to-top-scroll