header-logo header-logo

09 September 2022
Issue: 7993 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Criminal , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Will Truss fix justice crisis?

Lawyers have urged Prime Minister Liz Truss to address the crisis in the justice system, following bad-mouthing of ‘lefty’ lawyers by the previous incumbent and amid a bleak landscape of strikes, case backlogs and severe court delays

Truss, who took office this week, served as Justice Secretary for 11 months from July 2016 in Theresa May’s government, so should be familiar with issues affecting the legal profession although there have been four Justice Secretaries since her tenure. Former Justice Secretary, Dominic Raab, lost his post this week with barrister and former Northern Ireland Secretary Brandon Lewis taking over the role. Former Attorney-General Suella Braverman has been appointed Home Secretary.

Law Society president I Stephanie Boyce called on Truss to respect the rule of law at home and with international partners, and to do ‘a complete rethink’ of the Bill of Rights Bill which in its current form ‘would disempower people in Britain while giving the state more unfettered authority’.

Boyce urged Truss to support small law firms faced with rising energy costs, and to ‘immediately implement’ the minimum 15% criminal legal aid rate increase recommended by the Criminal Legal Aid Review.

Criminal Bar Association (CBA) members began an indefinite strike this week over legal aid fees for defence work. Meanwhile, magistrates’ court staff are due to begin nine days of strike action next week over the rollout of HM Courts & Tribunals Service’s ‘Common Platform’ digital case management system, which trade union PCSU officials say is so flawed it is having a ‘negative impact on members’ health, safety and welfare’. The IT system, which has cost £236m as of the end of March 2021, is now live in 143 courts with further rollouts planned up until February.

CBA chair Kirsty Brimelow QC called on the new Justice Secretary to open negotiations with the CBA ‘as soon as they come into office’.

Brimelow said: ‘The current commitment of only 15% increase on fees and only on new cases—where payment will be received at the end of 2023 and beyond—barely earmarks £35m for criminal barristers.

‘There must be a floor that no government can dig below in the future. Barristers in criminal law provide a public service.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Forbes Solicitors—Stephen Barnfield

Forbes Solicitors—Stephen Barnfield

Regulatory team boosted by partner hire amid rising health and safety demand

Arc Pensions Law—Kris Weber

Arc Pensions Law—Kris Weber

Legal director promoted to partner at specialist pensions firm

Clarke Willmott—Jonathan Cree

Clarke Willmott—Jonathan Cree

Residential development capability expands with partner hire in Birmingham

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll