header-logo header-logo

30 March 2008 / Paola Fudakowska , Adam Cloherty , Paula Hewitt
Issue: 7266 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Wills and probate

Service out of jurisdiction, Making wills for family members, Lifetime gifts

CONSTRUCTION

Thomas v Kent [2006] EWCA Civ 1485, [2006] All ER (D) 57 (May)

John Jones died in 1944 leaving a will which provided for an ultimate trust, to take effect after successive life interests, “unto my brothers (excluding and excepting my brother David Jones) and sisters in equal shares, the shares of any deceased brother or sister to be taken by his or her children in equal shares”.

The deceased was one of 11 children. When the will was executed the excluded brother and three sisters were known to be alive. In 1992 the estate became subject to the ultimate trust. The trustees applied to the court to establish how the fund should be distributed. The trustees’ view was that descendants of all the brothers and sisters (excluding David Jones) should benefit.

Pauline Kent, a partner in a firm of solicitors, was joined as a defendant to the proceedings to represent those who would benefit if ‘brothers and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll