header-logo header-logo

30 March 2008 / Paola Fudakowska , Adam Cloherty , Paula Hewitt
Issue: 7266 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Wills and probate

Service out of jurisdiction, Making wills for family members, Lifetime gifts

CONSTRUCTION

Thomas v Kent [2006] EWCA Civ 1485, [2006] All ER (D) 57 (May)

John Jones died in 1944 leaving a will which provided for an ultimate trust, to take effect after successive life interests, “unto my brothers (excluding and excepting my brother David Jones) and sisters in equal shares, the shares of any deceased brother or sister to be taken by his or her children in equal shares”.

The deceased was one of 11 children. When the will was executed the excluded brother and three sisters were known to be alive. In 1992 the estate became subject to the ultimate trust. The trustees applied to the court to establish how the fund should be distributed. The trustees’ view was that descendants of all the brothers and sisters (excluding David Jones) should benefit.

Pauline Kent, a partner in a firm of solicitors, was joined as a defendant to the proceedings to represent those who would benefit if ‘brothers and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll