header-logo header-logo

Wills & probate: Beware the beneficiary

23 June 2020 / Constance McDonnell KC
Issue: 7892 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail
23166
When a beneficiary becomes a wolf in sheep’s clothing: Beddoe relief & derivative claims, examined by Constance McDonnell QC
  • Bringing a claim: motivations of a beneficiary v a PR.
  • Roberts v Gill: principles of bringing a claim.
  • Beddoe applications: time to consider the possibility of a derivative claim?

It is not uncommon, indeed probably the norm, for a beneficiary to have stronger motivation than a personal representative to bring a claim on behalf of an estate where that beneficiary has personal knowledge of a perceived wrong done to their deceased relative and/or where the value of that beneficiary’s inheritance would be substantially affected by a successful outcome to the proposed claim. Subject to their resources, the beneficiary may therefore be more likely to be prepared to take up the cudgels on behalf of the estate and to pursue the claim with all necessary resources than an understandably more cautious PR.

Principles

It is now well settled that a beneficiary can bring a derivative

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

University of Manchester: The LLM driving tech-focused career growth

University of Manchester: The LLM driving tech-focused career growth

Manchester’s online LLM has accelerated career progression for its graduates

mfg Solicitors—Philip Chapman

mfg Solicitors—Philip Chapman

Regional firm strengthens corporate team with partner hire

Switalskis—Sally Christey, Mathew Abiagom & Cyman Kaur

Switalskis—Sally Christey, Mathew Abiagom & Cyman Kaur

Commercial property team expands with trio of appointments

NEWS
Judging is ‘more intellectually demanding than any other role in public life’—and far messier than outsiders imagine. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC reflects on decades spent wrestling with unclear legislation, fragile precedent and human fallibility
The long-predicted death of the billable hour may finally be here—and this time, it’s armed with a scythe. In a sweeping critique of time-based billing, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, argues in this week's NLJ that artificial intelligence has made hourly charging ‘intellectually, commercially and ethically indefensible’
From fake authorities to rent reform, the civil courts have had a busy start to 2026. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold surveys a procedural landscape where guidance, discretion and discipline are all under strain
Fact-finding hearings remain a fault line in private family law. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Rylatt and Robyn Laye of Anthony Gold Solicitors analyse recent appeals exposing the dangers of rushed or fragmented findings
As the Winter Olympics open in Milan and Cortina, legal disputes are once again being resolved almost as fast as the athletes compete. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Ian Blackshaw of Valloni Attorneys examines the Court of Arbitration for Sport’s (CAS's) ad hoc divisions, which can decide cases within 24 hours
back-to-top-scroll