header-logo header-logo

Wills & probate: Beware the beneficiary

23 June 2020 / Constance McDonnell KC
Issue: 7892 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail
23166
When a beneficiary becomes a wolf in sheep’s clothing: Beddoe relief & derivative claims, examined by Constance McDonnell QC
  • Bringing a claim: motivations of a beneficiary v a PR.
  • Roberts v Gill: principles of bringing a claim.
  • Beddoe applications: time to consider the possibility of a derivative claim?

It is not uncommon, indeed probably the norm, for a beneficiary to have stronger motivation than a personal representative to bring a claim on behalf of an estate where that beneficiary has personal knowledge of a perceived wrong done to their deceased relative and/or where the value of that beneficiary’s inheritance would be substantially affected by a successful outcome to the proposed claim. Subject to their resources, the beneficiary may therefore be more likely to be prepared to take up the cudgels on behalf of the estate and to pursue the claim with all necessary resources than an understandably more cautious PR.

Principles

It is now well settled that a beneficiary can bring a derivative

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bloomsbury Square Employment Law—Donna Clancy

Bloomsbury Square Employment Law—Donna Clancy

Employment law team strengthened with partner appointment

mfg Solicitors—Matt Smith

mfg Solicitors—Matt Smith

Corporate solicitor joins as partner in Birmingham

Freeths—Joe Lythgoe

Freeths—Joe Lythgoe

Corporate director with expertise in creative industries joins mergers and acquisitions team

NEWS
The High Court’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has thrown the careers of experienced CILEX litigators into jeopardy, warns Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers in NLJ this week
Sir Brian Leveson’s claim that there is ‘no right to jury trial’ erects a constitutional straw man, argues Professor Graham Zellick KC in NLJ this week. He argues that Leveson dismantles a position almost no-one truly holds, and thereby obscures the deeper issue: the jury’s place within the UK’s constitutional tradition
Why have private prosecutions surged despite limited data? Niall Hearty of Rahman Ravelli explores their rise in this week's NLJ 
The public law team at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer surveys significant recent human rights and judicial review rulings in this week's NLJ
In this week's NLJ, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley examines how debarring orders, while attractive to claimants seeking swift resolution, can complicate trials—most notably in fraud cases requiring ‘particularly cogent’ proof
back-to-top-scroll