header-logo header-logo

Wills & probate: Inherent challenges

05 August 2020 / Chris Bryden , Tori Adams
Issue: 7898 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail
25531
Challenges to wills are on the rise. Chris Bryden & Tori Adams report

In brief

  • A growth in challenges to wills: in respect of capacity and under the provisions of the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975.
  • Bringing a claim: litigation uncertainty, conditional fee agreements and high percentage success fees.
  • Recovering success fees: the importance of early settlement.

There has been, over the last few years, a marked increase in the number of challenges to wills, both in respect of capacity and brought under the provisions of the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 (the 1975 Act). This growth may be driven by a number of factors, likely including the increase in second and further marriages, meaning that testators may have multiple dependants who are not connected to one another save through the deceased; the increase in property values, meaning that many estates are worth significantly more; and the continuing problem of people dying without leaving a will, meaning that the provisions

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll