header-logo header-logo

Wills & probate update

28 June 2018 / Henrietta Mason , Harriet Gibson , Chris Williams
Issue: 7799 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail
nlj_7799_williams-

Lessons in undue influence & beneficial interests. An update from the courts by Henrietta Mason, Harriet Gibson & Chris Williams

  • The high threshold demanded when trying to demonstrate undue influence.
  • Parties should consider explicit wording to either include or exclude their beneficial interests in a joint account.

In Whitlock v Moree [2017] UKPC 44, Francis Lennard and his friend David Moree opened a joint account at First Caribbean International Bank (Bahamas) Ltd (FCIB) in November 2009. The money ($190,000) was all contributed by Francis. Both men signed an account opening application in FCIB’s standard format which stipulated (clause 20), ‘JOINT TENANCY: Unless otherwise agreed in writing, all money which is now or may later be created to the Account (including all interest) is our joint property with the right of survivorship. That means if one of us dies, all money in the account will automatically become the property of the other account holder(s). In order to make this legally effective, we each assign such money to the other account holder...’.

David

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll