header-logo header-logo

28 June 2018 / Henrietta Mason , Harriet Gibson , Chris Williams
Issue: 7799 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Wills & probate update

nlj_7799_williams-

Lessons in undue influence & beneficial interests. An update from the courts by Henrietta Mason, Harriet Gibson & Chris Williams

  • The high threshold demanded when trying to demonstrate undue influence.
  • Parties should consider explicit wording to either include or exclude their beneficial interests in a joint account.

In Whitlock v Moree [2017] UKPC 44, Francis Lennard and his friend David Moree opened a joint account at First Caribbean International Bank (Bahamas) Ltd (FCIB) in November 2009. The money ($190,000) was all contributed by Francis. Both men signed an account opening application in FCIB’s standard format which stipulated (clause 20), ‘JOINT TENANCY: Unless otherwise agreed in writing, all money which is now or may later be created to the Account (including all interest) is our joint property with the right of survivorship. That means if one of us dies, all money in the account will automatically become the property of the other account holder(s). In order to make this legally effective, we each assign such money to the other account holder...’.

David

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Jonathan Askin

Hugh James—Jonathan Askin

London corporate and commercial team announces partner appointment

Michelman Robinson—Daniel Burbeary

Michelman Robinson—Daniel Burbeary

Firm names partner as London office managing partner

Kingsley Napley—Jonathan Grimes

Kingsley Napley—Jonathan Grimes

Firm appoints new head of criminal litigation team

NEWS
Personal injury lawyers have welcomed a government U-turn on a ‘substantial prejudice’ defence that risked enabling defendants in child sexual abuse civil cases to have proceedings against them dropped
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll