header-logo header-logo

28 June 2018 / Henrietta Mason , Harriet Gibson , Chris Williams
Issue: 7799 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Wills & probate update

nlj_7799_williams-

Lessons in undue influence & beneficial interests. An update from the courts by Henrietta Mason, Harriet Gibson & Chris Williams

  • The high threshold demanded when trying to demonstrate undue influence.
  • Parties should consider explicit wording to either include or exclude their beneficial interests in a joint account.

In Whitlock v Moree [2017] UKPC 44, Francis Lennard and his friend David Moree opened a joint account at First Caribbean International Bank (Bahamas) Ltd (FCIB) in November 2009. The money ($190,000) was all contributed by Francis. Both men signed an account opening application in FCIB’s standard format which stipulated (clause 20), ‘JOINT TENANCY: Unless otherwise agreed in writing, all money which is now or may later be created to the Account (including all interest) is our joint property with the right of survivorship. That means if one of us dies, all money in the account will automatically become the property of the other account holder(s). In order to make this legally effective, we each assign such money to the other account holder...’.

David

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll