header-logo header-logo

19 January 2018 / Constance McDonnell KC
Issue: 7777 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Wills, spills, forgery & other ills

nlj_7777_mcdonnell

It’s a family affair: Constance McDonnell presents a review of key contentious probate cases

  • Testamentary capacity & weight of evidence of a solicitor or other professional who prepared the will.
  • Want of knowledge & approval.
  • Claims by adult children.

Three recent cases in which testamentary capacity was an issue highlight the weight which is likely to be given to the evidence of a solicitor or other professional who prepared the will.

In Edkins v Hopkins [2016] EWHC 2542 (Ch), HHJ Jarman QC sitting in the Cardiff District Registry considered the validity of a will made by a testator (T) three months before his death at the age of 59 due to alcoholic liver damage. The will had been prepared by a solicitor who had many years’ experience of drafting wills and who attended T at home. She did not follow the Golden Rule as she did not feel it was necessary. She did, however, produce a very full attendance note. By the disputed will T gave shares worth £822,000

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Partner and Manchester office lead appointed head of family

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

DWF insurance services director appointed to Civil Justice Council

R3—Jodie Wildridge

R3—Jodie Wildridge

Kings Chambers barrister appointed chair of R3 Yorkshire

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll