header-logo header-logo

Wills, spills, forgery & other ills

19 January 2018 / Constance McDonnell KC
Issue: 7777 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail
nlj_7777_mcdonnell

It’s a family affair: Constance McDonnell presents a review of key contentious probate cases

  • Testamentary capacity & weight of evidence of a solicitor or other professional who prepared the will.
  • Want of knowledge & approval.
  • Claims by adult children.

Three recent cases in which testamentary capacity was an issue highlight the weight which is likely to be given to the evidence of a solicitor or other professional who prepared the will.

In Edkins v Hopkins [2016] EWHC 2542 (Ch), HHJ Jarman QC sitting in the Cardiff District Registry considered the validity of a will made by a testator (T) three months before his death at the age of 59 due to alcoholic liver damage. The will had been prepared by a solicitor who had many years’ experience of drafting wills and who attended T at home. She did not follow the Golden Rule as she did not feel it was necessary. She did, however, produce a very full attendance note. By the disputed will T gave shares worth £822,000

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll