header-logo header-logo

14 June 2024 / David Wolchover
Issue: 8075 / Categories: Features , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Without foundation or precedent?

David Wolchover urges cutting of the Gordian knot over Michael Stone’s conviction for the Russell murders

On 9 July 1996, Dr Lin Russell and her young daughters Megan and Josie were walking home from a school swimming gala in Chillenden, Kent, when a man brutally attacked them along an unmade track. Dr Russell and Megan died but Josie survived.

Michael John Stone had a history of serious violence and on the first anniversary of the murders, an E-fit of the suspected killer was broadcast on the BBC TV Crimewatch programme. A psychiatrist who had treated Stone contacted the police to report that he thought the image resembled his patient and Stone was arrested a week later. Through many hours of interviews, he stoutly maintained his innocence and was not then charged, but he was remanded in custody on unrelated acquisitive offences.

Controversial witness

An ostensible breakthrough in the case took place on 23 September 1997. It was well known, at least within Canterbury prison, that Stone remained the main suspect. To avoid

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

McCarthy Denning—Harvey Knight & Martin Sandler

McCarthy Denning—Harvey Knight & Martin Sandler

Financial services and regulatory offering boosted by partner hires

NEWS
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
back-to-top-scroll