header-logo header-logo

14 June 2024 / David Wolchover
Issue: 8075 / Categories: Features , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Without foundation or precedent?

David Wolchover urges cutting of the Gordian knot over Michael Stone’s conviction for the Russell murders

On 9 July 1996, Dr Lin Russell and her young daughters Megan and Josie were walking home from a school swimming gala in Chillenden, Kent, when a man brutally attacked them along an unmade track. Dr Russell and Megan died but Josie survived.

Michael John Stone had a history of serious violence and on the first anniversary of the murders, an E-fit of the suspected killer was broadcast on the BBC TV Crimewatch programme. A psychiatrist who had treated Stone contacted the police to report that he thought the image resembled his patient and Stone was arrested a week later. Through many hours of interviews, he stoutly maintained his innocence and was not then charged, but he was remanded in custody on unrelated acquisitive offences.

Controversial witness

An ostensible breakthrough in the case took place on 23 September 1997. It was well known, at least within Canterbury prison, that Stone remained the main suspect. To avoid

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll