header-logo header-logo

18 July 2014 / Julie Man
Issue: 7615 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Wolf in sheep’s clothing?

What price simplicity? Julie Man remains unconvinced by HMRC’s latest strategy

On 6 June 2014, HMRC released a further consultation I nheritance tax: a fairer way of calculating trust charges . To date, this is the third consultation published as part of their continuing mission to establish simplification, reform and reduce the administrative burden for trustees in calculating inheritance tax (IHT) on relevant property trusts. Though this process may appear benign, underpinning the whole strategy is HMRC’s policy to achieve this “without jeopardising Exchequer revenue”. The third consultation sets out proposals for a simplified application of the 6% anniversary charge and the treatment of the nil-rate band where a settlor has made a number of lifetime trusts.

Charging basis

Most private client practitioners will be familiar with the charging basis of relevant property trusts which require calculations for 10 year anniversary charges at 6% on the value of the trust fund over the applicable nil-rate band at the anniversary, together with exit charges based on a proportion of this 6% when property leaves

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll