header-logo header-logo

18 July 2014 / Julie Man
Issue: 7615 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Wolf in sheep’s clothing?

What price simplicity? Julie Man remains unconvinced by HMRC’s latest strategy

On 6 June 2014, HMRC released a further consultation I nheritance tax: a fairer way of calculating trust charges . To date, this is the third consultation published as part of their continuing mission to establish simplification, reform and reduce the administrative burden for trustees in calculating inheritance tax (IHT) on relevant property trusts. Though this process may appear benign, underpinning the whole strategy is HMRC’s policy to achieve this “without jeopardising Exchequer revenue”. The third consultation sets out proposals for a simplified application of the 6% anniversary charge and the treatment of the nil-rate band where a settlor has made a number of lifetime trusts.

Charging basis

Most private client practitioners will be familiar with the charging basis of relevant property trusts which require calculations for 10 year anniversary charges at 6% on the value of the trust fund over the applicable nil-rate band at the anniversary, together with exit charges based on a proportion of this 6% when property leaves

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll