header-logo header-logo

Women’s sport & the law

07 April 2023 / Naomi Cunningham , Fiona McAnena
Issue: 8020 / Categories: Opinion , Sports law , Equality , Health & safety
printer mail-detail
What is fair & what is legal when it comes to trans inclusion in elite women’s sports? Naomi Cunningham & Fiona McAnena weigh up the law & the latest guidance

For as long as there has been organised sport, where women have been permitted to participate at all, men and women have competed in separate categories. The reason is obvious: the enormous athletic advantage conferred by male puberty. Last month World Athletics announced that no athlete who had gone through male puberty would be allowed to compete in women’s world ranking competitions. UK Athletics has just followed suit.

What does the law say?

When sex discrimination was made unlawful in the UK by the Sex Discrimination Act 1975 (SDA 1975), an extensive scheme of exceptions was included to deal with the many situations in which direct sex discrimination is justified and necessary. Sport was one of them: s 44, SDA 1975 simply excluded ‘any sport, game or other activity of a competitive nature where the physical strength, stamina

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll