header-logo header-logo

Women’s sport & the law

07 April 2023 / Naomi Cunningham , Fiona McAnena
Issue: 8020 / Categories: Opinion , Sports law , Equality , Health & safety
printer mail-detail
What is fair & what is legal when it comes to trans inclusion in elite women’s sports? Naomi Cunningham & Fiona McAnena weigh up the law & the latest guidance

For as long as there has been organised sport, where women have been permitted to participate at all, men and women have competed in separate categories. The reason is obvious: the enormous athletic advantage conferred by male puberty. Last month World Athletics announced that no athlete who had gone through male puberty would be allowed to compete in women’s world ranking competitions. UK Athletics has just followed suit.

What does the law say?

When sex discrimination was made unlawful in the UK by the Sex Discrimination Act 1975 (SDA 1975), an extensive scheme of exceptions was included to deal with the many situations in which direct sex discrimination is justified and necessary. Sport was one of them: s 44, SDA 1975 simply excluded ‘any sport, game or other activity of a competitive nature where the physical strength, stamina

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll