header-logo header-logo

06 June 2013 / Dominic Regan
Categories: Opinion , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

A work in progress

Dominic Regan offers an exclusive insight into the latest thoughts of Lord Justice Jackson…

The Rules Committee is to meet today (Friday 7 June). It is under government pressure on two fronts. Long signalled is an increase in the road traffic portal threshold from £10,000 to £25,000. This is not as big a deal as one might suspect. Not that many cases fall within this bracket. This I know for I have checked with two impeccable sources—a major road traffic insurer and the indefatigable John Spencer. Sir Rupert Jackson has also made the point to me that, the higher the value, the more likely it is that the defendant insurer would want to carefully scrutinise the claim and that is a luxury not permitted by the portal regime. An early admission is obligatory for otherwise the claim will exit and there is no coming back.

Of far greater significance, and at the crux of today’s agenda, is the implementation of new portals to catch injury claims, be they employers’ liability or otherwise. What is ground-breaking

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sidley—James Inness

Sidley—James Inness

Partner joins capital markets team in London office

Haynes Boone—William Cecil

Haynes Boone—William Cecil

Firm announces appointment of partner as UK general counsel

Devonshires—Nicholas Barrows

Devonshires—Nicholas Barrows

Firm appoints first chief marketing officer to drive growth strategy

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
The long-running Mazur saga edged towards its finale as the Court of Appeal heard arguments on whether non-solicitors can ‘conduct litigation’. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School reports from a packed courtroom where 16 wigs watched Nick Bacon KC argue that Mr Justice Sheldon had failed to distinguish between ‘tasks and responsibilities’
Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
back-to-top-scroll