header-logo header-logo

A work in progress

06 June 2013 / Dominic Regan
Categories: Opinion , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Dominic Regan offers an exclusive insight into the latest thoughts of Lord Justice Jackson…

The Rules Committee is to meet today (Friday 7 June). It is under government pressure on two fronts. Long signalled is an increase in the road traffic portal threshold from £10,000 to £25,000. This is not as big a deal as one might suspect. Not that many cases fall within this bracket. This I know for I have checked with two impeccable sources—a major road traffic insurer and the indefatigable John Spencer. Sir Rupert Jackson has also made the point to me that, the higher the value, the more likely it is that the defendant insurer would want to carefully scrutinise the claim and that is a luxury not permitted by the portal regime. An early admission is obligatory for otherwise the claim will exit and there is no coming back.

Of far greater significance, and at the crux of today’s agenda, is the implementation of new portals to catch injury claims, be they employers’ liability or otherwise. What is ground-breaking

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Oliver Banks

Slater Heelis—Oliver Banks

Manchester firm strengthens Court of Protection expertise with partner hire

Talbots Law—Sara Pickerin & Nicholas Playford

Talbots Law—Sara Pickerin & Nicholas Playford

Agricultural law team expands with senior director appointments

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Firm announces appointment of chief legal officer

NEWS
In this week's NLJ, Sophie Houghton of LexisPSL distils the key lesson from recent costs cases: if you want to exceed guideline hourly rates (GHR), you must prove why
With chronic underfunding and rising demand leaving thousands without legal help, technology could transform access to justice—if handled wisely, writes Professor Sue Prince of the University of Exeter in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) has restated a fundamental truth, writes John Gould, chair of Russell-Cooke, in this week's NLJ: only authorised persons can conduct litigation. The decision sparked alarm, but Gould stresses it merely confirms the Legal Services Act 2007
The government’s decision to make the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) the Single Professional Services Supervisor marks a watershed in the UK’s fight against money laundering, says Rebecca Hughes of Corker Binning in this week's NLJ. The FCA will now oversee 60,000 firms across legal and accountancy sectors—a massive expansion of remit that raises questions over resources and readiness 
The High Court's decision in Parfitt v Jones [2025] EWHC 1552 (Ch) provided a striking reminder of the need to instruct the right expert in retrospective capacity assessments, says Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll