header-logo header-logo

21 May 2010 / Ana Stanic
Issue: 7418 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Arbitration
printer mail-detail

Working progress?

Ana Stanic discusses the revised UNCITRAL arbitration rules

The UNCITRAL arbitration rules (the rules) were adopted by the United Nations Commission for International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) and the UN General Assembly in 1976. The rules seek to create a unified, predictable and stable procedural framework for ad hoc (non-administered) international arbitration acceptable in countries with different legal, social and economic systems.

Although designed for international trade disputes, the rules have been successfully used in state-to-state and investor-state arbitrations. In addition, the rules have been used as the template (sometimes with modifications) for arbitral rules of numerous arbitral institutions, including International Centre for Dispute Resolution, Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre, Cairo International Commercial Arbitration Centre and the Iran-US Claims Tribunal.  

 “Seeking to modernise the rules and to promote greater efficiency in arbitral proceedings”, an UNCITRAL Working Group was set up to discuss possible revisions of the rules in 2006. The group, which has met on 52 occasions since inception, comprises representatives of the 60 members of UNCITRAL. Many non-member countries and non-governmental organisations, such as

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll