header-logo header-logo

26 June 2008 / John Trotter
Issue: 7327 / Categories: Features , Legal services , Procedure & practice , Costs
printer mail-detail

Worth the fight?

When is a formal settlement offer “beaten” for the purposes of CPR, Pt 36? John Trotter and Giles Hutt report

In April last year CPR, Pt 36 was overhauled, primarily with the intention of simplifying the rules and allowing defendants to make formal settlement offers without paying money into court. No-one had then expected all defendants to be able to make a “Pt 36 offer” without producing the settlement money up front: the government's consultation paper and previous case law had suggested this was appropriate only for defendants such as public sector defendants who were self-evidently “good for the money”, although Lord Woolf's reports had considered such a change in 1997. However, a further surprise was in store, when the Court of Appeal delivered its judgment 12 months later in Carver v BAA plc [2008] EWCA Civ 412, [2008] All ER (D) 295 (Apr).

The case concerned an air hostess who hurt her ankle when stepping into a defective lift at Gatwick airport.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll