header-logo header-logo

Worth the fight?

26 June 2008 / John Trotter
Issue: 7327 / Categories: Features , Legal services , Procedure & practice , Costs
printer mail-detail

When is a formal settlement offer “beaten” for the purposes of CPR, Pt 36? John Trotter and Giles Hutt report

In April last year CPR, Pt 36 was overhauled, primarily with the intention of simplifying the rules and allowing defendants to make formal settlement offers without paying money into court. No-one had then expected all defendants to be able to make a “Pt 36 offer” without producing the settlement money up front: the government's consultation paper and previous case law had suggested this was appropriate only for defendants such as public sector defendants who were self-evidently “good for the money”, although Lord Woolf's reports had considered such a change in 1997. However, a further surprise was in store, when the Court of Appeal delivered its judgment 12 months later in Carver v BAA plc [2008] EWCA Civ 412, [2008] All ER (D) 295 (Apr).

The case concerned an air hostess who hurt her ankle when stepping into a defective lift at Gatwick airport.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Taylor Rose—nine promotions

Taylor Rose—nine promotions

Leadership strengthened across core practice areas with nine new partners

Fieldfisher—Rebecca Maxwell

Fieldfisher—Rebecca Maxwell

Real estate team welcomes partner inBirmingham

Ward Hadaway—14 trainee solicitors

Ward Hadaway—14 trainee solicitors

Firm strengthens commitment to nurturing future legal talent

NEWS
Government plans for offender ‘restriction zones’ risk creating ‘digital cages’ that blur punishment with surveillance, warns Henrietta Ronson, partner at Corker Binning, in this week's issue of NLJ
Louise Uphill, senior associate at Moore Barlow LLP, dissects the faltering rollout of the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 in this week's NLJ
Judgments are ‘worthless without enforcement’, says HHJ Karen Walden-Smith, senior circuit judge and chair of the Civil Justice Council’s enforcement working group. In this week's NLJ, she breaks down the CJC’s April 2025 report, which identified systemic flaws and proposed 39 reforms, from modernising procedures to protecting vulnerable debtors
Writing in NLJ this week, Katherine Harding and Charlotte Finley of Penningtons Manches Cooper examine Standish v Standish [2025] UKSC 26, the Supreme Court ruling that narrowed what counts as matrimonial property, and its potential impact upon claims under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975
In this week's NLJ, Dr Jon Robins, editor of The Justice Gap and lecturer at Brighton University, reports on a campaign to posthumously exonerate Christine Keeler. 60 years after her perjury conviction, Keeler’s son Seymour Platt has petitioned the king to exercise the royal prerogative of mercy, arguing she was a victim of violence and moral hypocrisy, not deceit. Supported by Felicity Gerry KC, the dossier brands the conviction 'the ultimate in slut-shaming'
back-to-top-scroll