header-logo header-logo

08 May 2015 / Sarah Hughes
Issue: 7651 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

The (W)right approach

nlj_may_8_hughes

When should maintenance payments stop, asks Sarah Hughes

The highly publicised case of Wright v Wright [2015] EWCA Civ 201 has caused a stir following a comment by Lord Justice Pitchford that wives with children aged seven or older should “just get on with it” and go back to work like many other women with children.

This has led to a flurry of enquiries from (typically) ex-husbands asking whether they can stop paying their ex-wives maintenance and force them to go back to work instead.

Wright v Wright

This case involved a wife, Tracey Wright (now aged 51) and her ex-husband, Ian Wright (now aged 59). Mr Wright was an equine surgeon. Mrs Wright had worked prior to the marriage as a legal secretary and administrator but had left work to care for their two children of the marriage, now aged 10 and 16. It was a nine-year marriage.

They divorced in 2008 and the financial order made by District Judge Cushing required Mr Wright to pay joint lives spousal maintenance of £33,200 per

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
back-to-top-scroll