header-logo header-logo

08 May 2015 / Sarah Hughes
Issue: 7651 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

The (W)right approach

nlj_may_8_hughes

When should maintenance payments stop, asks Sarah Hughes

The highly publicised case of Wright v Wright [2015] EWCA Civ 201 has caused a stir following a comment by Lord Justice Pitchford that wives with children aged seven or older should “just get on with it” and go back to work like many other women with children.

This has led to a flurry of enquiries from (typically) ex-husbands asking whether they can stop paying their ex-wives maintenance and force them to go back to work instead.

Wright v Wright

This case involved a wife, Tracey Wright (now aged 51) and her ex-husband, Ian Wright (now aged 59). Mr Wright was an equine surgeon. Mrs Wright had worked prior to the marriage as a legal secretary and administrator but had left work to care for their two children of the marriage, now aged 10 and 16. It was a nine-year marriage.

They divorced in 2008 and the financial order made by District Judge Cushing required Mr Wright to pay joint lives spousal maintenance of £33,200 per

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll