header-logo header-logo

02 December 2022 / Athelstane Aamodt
Issue: 8005 / Categories: Features , Criminal , Media
printer mail-detail

Writing wrongs: when spies become authors

102811
Spying on your government is bad enough… but writing a book about it? Athelstane Aamodt explains why things are not always as they seem

The recent admission made by David Smith, a former security guard at the British Embassy in Berlin, that he had been spying for the Russian government for almost eight years, is the latest in a long line of revelations made by particular British citizens that they have in fact been doing the bidding of the Kremlin. The UK has provided Russia (and previously the Soviet Union) with a fair number of agents, most notably the ‘Cambridge Five’ of Donald Maclean, Guy Burgess, Kim Philby, Anthony Blunt, and John Cairncross.

Spies create problems for the law. In a criminal case, such as Mr Smith’s, it is simple enough: the wrongdoing is discovered, the person responsible is charged and, if the evidence is sufficient, they are convicted and sentenced. Things are not always clear-cut of course (the Alger Hiss case in the United States being a good

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Family law boutique expands London team with legal director hire

Ward Hadaway—Mike Gore

Ward Hadaway—Mike Gore

Firm enhances advisory capability with strategic risk specialist hire

Stewarts—Alexandra Lyons

Stewarts—Alexandra Lyons

Insurance and reinsurance specialist joins policyholder disputes practice as partner

NEWS
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
The fallout from Lord Mandelson’s appointment and dismissal as UK ambassador to Washington raises profound questions about constitutional governance, accountability and political appointments
Pastries may be in the firing line while kebabs escape scrutiny, but the reality is far more nuanced
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised
back-to-top-scroll