header-logo header-logo

08 September 2011
Issue: 7480 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

xxx threat to brands

Brand owners are being urged to act to stop their names being sullied by association with the adult entertainment industry (AEI)

Applications opened this week for the new .xxx domain, which is designed to clearly signpost global AEI sites. Due to concerns that non-AEI brands will have their trademarks held to ransom by cyber squatters, brand owners will be able to block their trademarks from registration under the .xxx domain. This option is not available to brand owners cyber-squatted under other domains, such as .com.

Douglas Thomson, trademark attorney at Marks & Clerk, said: “Cybersquatting—whereby opportunists buy up branded domain names in the hope of re-selling them—is a problem across the net, but has the potential for uniquely embarrassing and damaging consequences in this case.

“With other domains, the only effective means of brand protection is to buy the name you want protected, a far costlier and more time consuming process which still leaves you with a website you don’t necessarily want.

“The only sure way to protect their brands cheaply is by blocking them from the .xxx domain.”

According to ICM Registry, the company behind .xxx, brand owners have a 50-day “sunrise” period ending on 28 October 2011 in which to either register or block their brand.

Issue: 7480 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll