header-logo header-logo

08 September 2011
Issue: 7480 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

xxx threat to brands

Brand owners are being urged to act to stop their names being sullied by association with the adult entertainment industry (AEI)

Applications opened this week for the new .xxx domain, which is designed to clearly signpost global AEI sites. Due to concerns that non-AEI brands will have their trademarks held to ransom by cyber squatters, brand owners will be able to block their trademarks from registration under the .xxx domain. This option is not available to brand owners cyber-squatted under other domains, such as .com.

Douglas Thomson, trademark attorney at Marks & Clerk, said: “Cybersquatting—whereby opportunists buy up branded domain names in the hope of re-selling them—is a problem across the net, but has the potential for uniquely embarrassing and damaging consequences in this case.

“With other domains, the only effective means of brand protection is to buy the name you want protected, a far costlier and more time consuming process which still leaves you with a website you don’t necessarily want.

“The only sure way to protect their brands cheaply is by blocking them from the .xxx domain.”

According to ICM Registry, the company behind .xxx, brand owners have a 50-day “sunrise” period ending on 28 October 2011 in which to either register or block their brand.

Issue: 7480 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll