header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
04 July 2013 / Graham Huntley
Issue: 7567 / Categories: Opinion , Commercial , ADR , Litigation trends
printer mail-detail

You can drag a horse to mediation....

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Graham Huntley sees limits to mediation in many commercial disputes

So much of the attention given to the Jackson reforms has been on the issue of proportionality of costs. However, Lord Justice Jackson also advocated a resurgence of interest in alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and in particular mediation. His Review of Civil Litigation Costs in January 2010 reached a conclusion that “ADR (particularly mediation) has a vital role to play in reducing the costs of civil disputes by fomenting the early settlement of cases” and that “its potential benefits are not as widely known as they should be”.

Authoritative book

In support of the general proposition he recommended an authoritative book on ADR be published, setting out practical elements and guidance for all judges who hear civil cases. The resulting book was published in May and apparently copies have been given to almost all High Court judges. At the same time the Ministry of Justice has cited mediation as the “raison d’être” or “excuse” for withdrawing legal

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll