header-logo header-logo

04 July 2013 / Graham Huntley
Issue: 7567 / Categories: Opinion , Commercial , ADR , Litigation trends
printer mail-detail

You can drag a horse to mediation....

Graham Huntley sees limits to mediation in many commercial disputes

So much of the attention given to the Jackson reforms has been on the issue of proportionality of costs. However, Lord Justice Jackson also advocated a resurgence of interest in alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and in particular mediation. His Review of Civil Litigation Costs in January 2010 reached a conclusion that “ADR (particularly mediation) has a vital role to play in reducing the costs of civil disputes by fomenting the early settlement of cases” and that “its potential benefits are not as widely known as they should be”.

Authoritative book

In support of the general proposition he recommended an authoritative book on ADR be published, setting out practical elements and guidance for all judges who hear civil cases. The resulting book was published in May and apparently copies have been given to almost all High Court judges. At the same time the Ministry of Justice has cited mediation as the “raison d’être” or “excuse” for withdrawing legal

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll