header-logo header-logo

Young Bar struggling―one in six could quit

28 January 2022
Issue: 7965 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail
One in six young barristers want to quit due to unmanageable workloads and fears report commissioned by the Bar Council has disclosed

One in six young barristers want to quit due to unmanageable workloads and fears report commissioned by the Bar Council has disclosed

‘Life at the Young Bar’, published this week, paints a bleak picture of 14-hour days, ‘deep-rooted’ discrimination against women and practitioners from under-represented backgrounds, and ‘significant’ financial repercussions from the closure of the courts during the pandemic.

The report, which is based on research into barristers with up to seven years’ practice, recommends that work should be allocated more fairly and made more manageable to ‘avoid burnout and the loss of young barristers from the profession’. About one in six told a survey last Spring that they wanted to leave the profession, the report says.

Only about half the barristers surveyed said they believe work is allocated fairly, and many said they ‘desperately’ need their workload reduced. The young barristers were ‘overwhelmingly’ opposed to extended operating hours within courts.

The research found COVID-19’s impact on the finances of young barristers were more significant than on the Bar as a whole.

On discrimination, the findings echoed those from the Bar Council’s report Race at the Bar, published in November 2021. Members of the Young Bar reported other barristers were the most common source of bullying and harassment or discrimination, followed by the judiciary.

The report states: ‘Several participants indicated that some judges were well-known on the circuit for being sexist and/or racist, and that as a young barrister their chambers or other colleagues would try to warn them to expect such an attitude in that particular court.

‘There was the over-riding assumption that judges were in the main old white males. There were also some experiences of discrimination within their own workplaces, either passive or, in a few cases, overt: “[A judge said to me] ‘Could the dark woman speak?’ At that time I cried every evening, I thought about leaving the Bar. I did use the reporting tool but didn’t feel I could raise it directly with the judge because it might hurt my client’s case”.’

Another young barrister confided: ‘It is very male in the criminal Bar, it still feels like a boys’ club, dominated by white privileged men, often kept in the family. It’s the same situation in chambers.’

Michael Polak, Chair of the Bar Council’s Young Barristers’ Committee, said: ‘This research should act as a wake-up call for those interested in the future of the profession.

‘It’s clear we need to modernise the way that the Bar operates. Our culture, working practices, and wellbeing must be key themes of the Bar Council’s work on behalf of the Young Bar over the coming year.

‘The report highlights the impact of the coronavirus pandemic, with young barristers having experienced adverse changes to their personal finances, relationships with colleagues and overall wellbeing.’

Mark Fenhalls QC, Chair of the Bar Council, said: ‘The Bar Council is committed to improving the working lives of young barristers and ensuring everyone has an opportunity to thrive.

‘Our profession has been ageing rapidly and we can ill-afford to lose the next generation for any reason. The pandemic has increased pressure and stress on everyone, but that is no excuse for unacceptable behaviours.

‘The Bar Council asks every barrister who experiences or witnesses inappropriate behaviour to use the online confidential and anonymous reporting tool ‘Spot’ so that we can take action.’

View the full 58-page report here.

Issue: 7965 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll