header-logo header-logo

08 October 2013 / Rita D’Alton-Harrison
Categories: Features , Family , Human rights , Employment
printer mail-detail

By your leave

dalton_image

Rita D’Alton-Harrison provides an update on the employment rights of commissioning mothers

Last month, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) handed down two important decisions on the employment rights of commissioning mothers whose children were born as a result of a surrogacy arrangement (see NLJ news story).

Surrogacy can be defined as an arrangement whereby a woman (the surrogate mother) agrees to carry a child for another or others. In such a situation there will be two potential mothers, the surrogate mother who carries the child and the commissioning mother who is intended to be the mother responsible for the nurture and care of the child. While it is recognised in both the UK and Ireland that the surrogate mother is entitled to full maternity rights as the gestational carrier of the child, the law does not provide the same protection for the commissioning mother. This is despite the fact that in some circumstances a commissioning mother could have a biological connection to the child if her ovum were

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Seddons GSC—Ben Marks

Seddons GSC—Ben Marks

Partner joins residential real estate team

Winckworth Sherwood—Shazia Bashir

Winckworth Sherwood—Shazia Bashir

Social housing team announces partner appointment

University of Manchester: The LLM driving tech-focused career growth

University of Manchester: The LLM driving tech-focused career growth

Manchester’s online LLM has accelerated career progression for its graduates

NEWS
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
back-to-top-scroll