header-logo header-logo

Zander’s reflections: the jury system

02 June 2023 / Michael Zander KC
Issue: 8027 / Categories: Features , Criminal , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail
124242
In the first of an occasional back page series, Michael Zander asks how much confidence people have in the jury system

The late Louis Blom-Cooper was not a fan of trial by jury in criminal cases. In one of the chapters in his Power of Persuasion—Essays by a Very Public Lawyer (Hart, 2015) Blom-Cooper wrote (p185): ‘It is assumed by criminal practitioners that the [jury] system does evoke the public’s confidence. But what evidence do we have for that supposition?’ He thought, ‘impressionistically speaking’, that until the Second World War ‘the British had overwhelming faith in the jury system’ but that, although support was still strong, ‘there is a growing disenchantment with its validity’.

Reading this recently, I went back to the Crown Court Study (1993), which I conducted as a member of the Runciman Royal Commission on Criminal Justice. The Crown Court Study (the Royal Commission’s Research Study No 19) was based on questionnaires completed by the participants in every case completed in every Crown Court in the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll