header-logo header-logo

02 June 2023 / Michael Zander KC
Issue: 8027 / Categories: Features , Criminal , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Zander’s reflections: the jury system

124242
In the first of an occasional back page series, Michael Zander asks how much confidence people have in the jury system

The late Louis Blom-Cooper was not a fan of trial by jury in criminal cases. In one of the chapters in his Power of Persuasion—Essays by a Very Public Lawyer (Hart, 2015) Blom-Cooper wrote (p185): ‘It is assumed by criminal practitioners that the [jury] system does evoke the public’s confidence. But what evidence do we have for that supposition?’ He thought, ‘impressionistically speaking’, that until the Second World War ‘the British had overwhelming faith in the jury system’ but that, although support was still strong, ‘there is a growing disenchantment with its validity’.

Reading this recently, I went back to the Crown Court Study (1993), which I conducted as a member of the Runciman Royal Commission on Criminal Justice. The Crown Court Study (the Royal Commission’s Research Study No 19) was based on questionnaires completed by the participants in every case completed in every Crown Court in the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll