header-logo header-logo

profile-sm_7

Masood Ahmed

Lecturer

Masood Ahmed is an associate professor of law at the University of Leicester & co-author of Arbitration of Commercial Disputes: English and International Law and Practice (Oxford University Press, 2025). Newlawjournal.co.uk

Lecturer

Masood Ahmed is an associate professor of law at the University of Leicester & co-author of Arbitration of Commercial Disputes: English and International Law and Practice (Oxford University Press, 2025). Newlawjournal.co.uk

ARTICLES BY THIS AUTHOR
Masood Ahmed provides guidance on taking evidence from non-parties in international arbitration
Masood Ahmed examines the scenario of challenging arbitral awards for inadequate reasons
Masood Ahmed outlines why there are no retrospective appeals in arbitration
Masood Ahmed investigates advertising costs in group litigation
Staying proceedings & dispute resolution clauses, explored by Masood Ahmed
Masood Ahmed reports on leave to enforce under s 66 of the Arbitration Act 1996
Masood Ahmed reflects on the significance of alternative dispute resolution & the dangers of unreasonable behaviour
Masood Ahmed serves up a timely reminder that only offers inclusive of interest are valid under Part 36
Show
8
Results
Results
8
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll