Jackson LJ’s proposal that a party should not be able to recover the cost of their After the Event (ATE) insurance premium has generated a lively debate. Like Marmite, either you love it or you hate it
Has Part 36 spawned its own cottage industry? Matthew Caton & Clare Arthurs report
Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire
Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering
Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team